Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

The aim is to present a number of thoughts about the meaning of negation. I argue that the best characterization of this concept is grounded in the notion of incompatibility, which compels us to considerate negation as an exclusion-expressing device. I show that is possible to conceive negation in t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Franceschini, Eliana
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2018
Materias:
incompatibilidad lógica multivaluada
negación
semántica no-determinista
incompatibility
multivalued logic
negation
non-deterministic semantics
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/6501
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=6501_oai
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R145-6501_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-6501_oai2025-11-17 Franceschini, Eliana 2018-02-02 The aim is to present a number of thoughts about the meaning of negation. I argue that the best characterization of this concept is grounded in the notion of incompatibility, which compels us to considerate negation as an exclusion-expressing device. I show that is possible to conceive negation in this way without having to accept, as Berto & Restall do, that it is a modal operator. For this I introduce algebraic non-deterministic matrices and explain how them allow us to model an exclusion-expressing device in the context of many-valued semantics, without having a negation that is not any more an extensional operator.  El objetivo de este trabajo es reflexionar acerca del sentido de la negación, y defender que la mejor manera de caracterizar esta noción es a partir de la idea de incompatibilidad, que nos conduce a considerar la negación como un dispositivo de expresión de alguna forma de exclusión. Mostraré también que puede concebirse de esta manera a la negación sin necesidad de, como hacen Berto y Restall (2019), tener que aceptar que se trate de un operador modal. Para esto presentaré las matrices algebraicas no deterministas y explicaré cómo puede modelarse una negación que exprese incompatibilidades en contextos multivaluados sin dejar de ser una conectiva extensional.  application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/6501 10.34096/cf.n70.6501 spa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/6501/5809 Cuadernos de filosofía; Núm. 70 (2018); 43-55 2362-485X 0590-1901 incompatibilidad lógica multivaluada negación semántica no-determinista incompatibility multivalued logic negation non-deterministic semantics Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices ¿Por qué ñot? Negación como incompatibilidad y matrices no-deterministas info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=6501_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic incompatibilidad lógica multivaluada
negación
semántica no-determinista
incompatibility
multivalued logic
negation
non-deterministic semantics
spellingShingle incompatibilidad lógica multivaluada
negación
semántica no-determinista
incompatibility
multivalued logic
negation
non-deterministic semantics
Franceschini, Eliana
Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
topic_facet incompatibilidad lógica multivaluada
negación
semántica no-determinista
incompatibility
multivalued logic
negation
non-deterministic semantics
description The aim is to present a number of thoughts about the meaning of negation. I argue that the best characterization of this concept is grounded in the notion of incompatibility, which compels us to considerate negation as an exclusion-expressing device. I show that is possible to conceive negation in this way without having to accept, as Berto & Restall do, that it is a modal operator. For this I introduce algebraic non-deterministic matrices and explain how them allow us to model an exclusion-expressing device in the context of many-valued semantics, without having a negation that is not any more an extensional operator. 
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Franceschini, Eliana
author_facet Franceschini, Eliana
author_sort Franceschini, Eliana
title Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
title_short Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
title_full Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
title_fullStr Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
title_full_unstemmed Why ñot? Negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
title_sort why ñot? negation as incompatibility and non-deterministic matrices
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2018
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/CdF/article/view/6501
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=cufilo&d=6501_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT franceschinieliana whynotnegationasincompatibilityandnondeterministicmatrices
AT franceschinieliana porquenotnegacioncomoincompatibilidadymatricesnodeterministas
_version_ 1851375824544989184

Ejemplares similares