Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field

Three of the five testimonies of the demagogía’s semantic field in Fifth-Century Athens’ texts belong to the aristophanic corpus (Eq.191, 217; Ra.419). Since 1972 scholars agree, from a historical and sociological perspective, that demagogía and demagogós were originally “neutral” (Connor, 1992; Lan...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Franco San Román, Mariana
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/afc/article/view/2527
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=anafilog&d=2527_oai
Aporte de:
id I28-R145-2527_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-2527_oai2025-11-17 Franco San Román, Mariana 2016-08-07 Three of the five testimonies of the demagogía’s semantic field in Fifth-Century Athens’ texts belong to the aristophanic corpus (Eq.191, 217; Ra.419). Since 1972 scholars agree, from a historical and sociological perspective, that demagogía and demagogós were originally “neutral” (Connor, 1992; Lane, 2012). Considering that words are characterized by a constitutive polysemy (Authier-Revuz, 1995), and that they take their meaning from those discursive formations in which they are produced (Pêcheux,1988), the aim of this article will be the analysis of the aristophanic testimonies’ cotext in the light of the theories of Discourse Studies and Rhetorical Studies. De los cinco testimonios del campo léxico de la demagogía del siglo V a.C., tres pertenecen al corpus aristofánico (Eq. 191, 217; Ra. 419). Desde 1972 la crítica, desde una perspectiva histórico-sociológica, considera que demagogía y demagogós eran originalmente “neutros” (Connor, 1992; Lane, 2012). Si consideramos que las palabras se caracterizan por una polisemia constitutiva (Authier-Revuz, 1995) y que estas adquieren sentido en la formación discursiva desde la que son producidas (Pêcheux, 1988), el objetivo del presente trabajo será analizar el cotexto de dichos testimonios a la luz de las teorías del Análisis del Discurso y de los Estudios Retóricos. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/afc/article/view/2527 10.34096/afc.v1i28.2527 spa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/afc/article/view/2527/2167 Anales de Filología Clásica; Vol. 1 Núm. 28 (2015); 19-32 2362-4841 0325-1721 demagogía Aristófanes retórica análisis del discurso polisemia demagogia Aristophanes rhetoric discourse analysis polysemy Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field Δημαγωγοί eran los de antes: la obra aristofánica como testimonio del campo léxico de la δημαγωγία info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=anafilog&d=2527_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic demagogía
Aristófanes
retórica
análisis del discurso
polisemia
demagogia
Aristophanes
rhetoric
discourse analysis
polysemy
spellingShingle demagogía
Aristófanes
retórica
análisis del discurso
polisemia
demagogia
Aristophanes
rhetoric
discourse analysis
polysemy
Franco San Román, Mariana
Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field
topic_facet demagogía
Aristófanes
retórica
análisis del discurso
polisemia
demagogia
Aristophanes
rhetoric
discourse analysis
polysemy
description Three of the five testimonies of the demagogía’s semantic field in Fifth-Century Athens’ texts belong to the aristophanic corpus (Eq.191, 217; Ra.419). Since 1972 scholars agree, from a historical and sociological perspective, that demagogía and demagogós were originally “neutral” (Connor, 1992; Lane, 2012). Considering that words are characterized by a constitutive polysemy (Authier-Revuz, 1995), and that they take their meaning from those discursive formations in which they are produced (Pêcheux,1988), the aim of this article will be the analysis of the aristophanic testimonies’ cotext in the light of the theories of Discourse Studies and Rhetorical Studies.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
author Franco San Román, Mariana
author_facet Franco San Román, Mariana
author_sort Franco San Román, Mariana
title Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field
title_short Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field
title_full Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field
title_fullStr Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field
title_full_unstemmed Good old δημαγωγοί: Aristophanic Plays as a Testimony for the δημαγωγία’s Semantic Field
title_sort good old δημαγωγοί: aristophanic plays as a testimony for the δημαγωγία’s semantic field
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2016
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/afc/article/view/2527
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=anafilog&d=2527_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT francosanromanmariana goodolddēmagōgoiaristophanicplaysasatestimonyforthedēmagōgiassemanticfield
AT francosanromanmariana dēmagōgoieranlosdeanteslaobraaristofanicacomotestimoniodelcampolexicodeladēmagōgia
_version_ 1857043101538844672