Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

This work is a reflection about the difficulty that exists in integrating into a coherent model, the principal positions included in the post-processual current. Until now, the multiple definitions are not sufficient to explain the post-processual current as is the theoretical interpretative positio...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Acosta, Marcelo
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Instituto de Arqueología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2013
Materias:
Fenomenología
Espacio
Arqueología histórica
Phenomenology
Space
Historical archaeology
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/Arqueologia/article/view/1672
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=arqueo&d=1672_oai
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R145-1672_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-1672_oai2025-11-17 Acosta, Marcelo 2013-12-01 This work is a reflection about the difficulty that exists in integrating into a coherent model, the principal positions included in the post-processual current. Until now, the multiple definitions are not sufficient to explain the post-processual current as is the theoretical interpretative position, as it is derived from the former postulates. It is still difficult to define because it acquired a certain complexity by consisting of numerous diverse theoretical notions. Since 1982 Ian Hodder has maintained that the culture includes a symbolic component, and it opened the door to numerous interpretations and debates, about the subjectivist postulates present in the culture. The pheno-menological position, as one of the subjectivist postulate, analyzes the subjective role of the archaeological records and can deduct from the discourses related to the material culture. In this analysis we try to clarify this problematic using examples stemming from the historical archaeology, particularly the spatial and architectural analysis of González Catán City (Partido de La Matanza) between 1869 and 1910. This phenomenological model allows us to think about of the use of preconceived paradigms and their consequences on the archaeological interpretation. Equally so, the Phenomenological model offers a solution to overcome the interpretive limitations of the archeo-logical records using the introspection, the critic and the reconstruction of the archaeological object. Este trabajo es una reflexión acerca de la dificultad que existe en integrar de forma coherente las principales posturas que integran la corriente post-procesual. Hasta ahora, las múltiples definiciones no son suficientes para explicarlo, como tampoco la postura teorética interpretativa, que hereda parte de sus postulados. Actualmente es difícil de definir, porque ha adquirido cierta complejidad, ya que abarca diferentes nociones teóricas. Desde 1982, Ian Hodder ha sostenido que la cultura incluye un componente simbólico, y abrió la puerta a numerosas inter-pretaciones y debates sobre los postulados subjetivistas presentes en la cultura. La postura fenomenológica, como uno más de ellos, analiza el rol subjetivo e interpreta los discursos presentes en el registro arqueológico. En este análisis intentaremos aclarar esta problemática mediante un ejemplo proveniente de la arqueología histórica, en particular el análisis espacial y arquitectónico de la ciudad de González Catán (Partido de La Matanza) entre 1869 y 1910. Este modelo fenomenológico nos permite reflexionar sobre la utilización de paradigmas preconcebidos y su incidencia en la interpretación arqueológica. Del mismo modo, el modelo fenomenológico ofrece una solución para superar las limitaciones de la interpretación del registro arqueológico por medio de la introspección, la crítica y la reconstrucción del objeto arqueológico. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/Arqueologia/article/view/1672 10.34096/arqueologia.t19.n0.1672 spa Instituto de Arqueología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/Arqueologia/article/view/1672/1578 Arqueología; Vol. 19 No. 3 (2013): September-December; 11-31 Arqueología; Vol. 19 Núm. 3 (2013): septiembre-diciembre; 11-31 1853-8126 0327-5159 Fenomenología Espacio Arqueología histórica Phenomenology Space Historical archaeology Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow? No sabe - no contesta. Se es postprocesualista, interpretativo o fenomenológico: ¿hay un modelo a seguir? info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=arqueo&d=1672_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
orig_language_str_mv spa
topic Fenomenología
Espacio
Arqueología histórica
Phenomenology
Space
Historical archaeology
spellingShingle Fenomenología
Espacio
Arqueología histórica
Phenomenology
Space
Historical archaeology
Acosta, Marcelo
Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?
topic_facet Fenomenología
Espacio
Arqueología histórica
Phenomenology
Space
Historical archaeology
description This work is a reflection about the difficulty that exists in integrating into a coherent model, the principal positions included in the post-processual current. Until now, the multiple definitions are not sufficient to explain the post-processual current as is the theoretical interpretative position, as it is derived from the former postulates. It is still difficult to define because it acquired a certain complexity by consisting of numerous diverse theoretical notions. Since 1982 Ian Hodder has maintained that the culture includes a symbolic component, and it opened the door to numerous interpretations and debates, about the subjectivist postulates present in the culture. The pheno-menological position, as one of the subjectivist postulate, analyzes the subjective role of the archaeological records and can deduct from the discourses related to the material culture. In this analysis we try to clarify this problematic using examples stemming from the historical archaeology, particularly the spatial and architectural analysis of González Catán City (Partido de La Matanza) between 1869 and 1910. This phenomenological model allows us to think about of the use of preconceived paradigms and their consequences on the archaeological interpretation. Equally so, the Phenomenological model offers a solution to overcome the interpretive limitations of the archeo-logical records using the introspection, the critic and the reconstruction of the archaeological object.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Acosta, Marcelo
author_facet Acosta, Marcelo
author_sort Acosta, Marcelo
title Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?
title_short Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?
title_full Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?
title_fullStr Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?
title_full_unstemmed Does not know - does not answer. We are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: Is there a model to follow?
title_sort does not know - does not answer. we are post-procesualist, interpretive or phenomenological: is there a model to follow?
publisher Instituto de Arqueología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2013
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/Arqueologia/article/view/1672
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=arqueo&d=1672_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT acostamarcelo doesnotknowdoesnotanswerwearepostprocesualistinterpretiveorphenomenologicalisthereamodeltofollow
AT acostamarcelo nosabenocontestaseespostprocesualistainterpretativoofenomenologicohayunmodeloaseguir
_version_ 1851374563307290624

Ejemplares similares