Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice
The university extension is an academic practice that has been built through daily experiences, thus forming relationships with the territory that characterizes and that allow it to be related it with different paradigms. On the other hand, some of its peculiarities, turned into descriptors, allow i...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Secretaría de Extensión y Bienestar Estudiantil, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/redes/article/view/10712 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=redes&d=10712_oai |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I28-R145-10712_oai |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
I28-R145-10712_oai2025-11-17 Zavaro Pérez, Mg. Carlos A. 2021-05-28 The university extension is an academic practice that has been built through daily experiences, thus forming relationships with the territory that characterizes and that allow it to be related it with different paradigms. On the other hand, some of its peculiarities, turned into descriptors, allow it to be distinguished from the other functions such as research and teaching, which at the same time –in my opinion– allows it to be frame it into the theory of fields from Pierre Bourdieu. Besides I propose to analyze some of its characteristics, emphasizing in the imprint of the territory and those who live in it, discussing the way in which some concepts and categories such as cultural capital, trajectories, subjectivities, tensions, dialogue, horizontality, purpose, habitus, among others contribute to its demarcation, but focusings the discussion in the way that the dynamics that configure the field in its structure, allow it to establish links and articulations with other academic fields, diluting of some of the limits that differentiated them, becoming the protagonist of the integral and integrative practice, in which they converge. La extensión universitaria ha sido una práctica académica que ha ido construyéndose a partir de las experiencias cotidianas, configurando en ese devenir relaciones con el territorio que la definen y ubican en diferentes paradigmas. En este sentido, algunas de sus particularidades, entendidas como descriptores, permiten diferenciarla de otras funciones académicas como la investigación y la docencia, a la vez que posibilitan enmarcarla -en mi opinión- bajo la teoría de campos que distingue la obra de Pierre Bourdieu. De esta manera me propongo analizar algunas de las características de la extensión, enfatizando en la impronta que ha tenido el territorio y los sujetos que lo habitan en su conformación como campo, discutiendo algunos conceptos y categorías como capital cultural, trayectorias, subjetividades, tensiones, diálogo, horizontalidad, propósito y habitus que contribuyen a su demarcación, pero enfocando la discusión en el modo en que esa dinámica, que configura el campo en su estructura, permite establecer nexos y articulaciones con los otros campos académicos, posibilitando la dilución de algunos de los límites que los diferenciaban, al constituirse en protagonista de la práctica integral, e integradora, en la que estos convergen. application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/redes/article/view/10712 10.34096/redes.n8.10712 spa Secretaría de Extensión y Bienestar Estudiantil, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/redes/article/view/10712/9451 Redes de Extensión; Vol. 1 No. 8 (2021): Universidades públicas y Extensión crítica en postpandemia; 58-75 Redes de Extensión; Vol. 1 Núm. 8 (2021): Universidades públicas y Extensión crítica en postpandemia; 58-75 2451-7348 Bourdieu habitus horizontalidad dialógico subjetividad prácticas integrales Bourdieu habitus horizontality dialogic subjectivity integral practices Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice Campo y territorio de la Extensión como práctica académica info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=redes&d=10712_oai |
| institution |
Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| institution_str |
I-28 |
| repository_str |
R-145 |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) |
| language |
Español |
| orig_language_str_mv |
spa |
| topic |
Bourdieu habitus horizontalidad dialógico subjetividad prácticas integrales Bourdieu habitus horizontality dialogic subjectivity integral practices |
| spellingShingle |
Bourdieu habitus horizontalidad dialógico subjetividad prácticas integrales Bourdieu habitus horizontality dialogic subjectivity integral practices Zavaro Pérez, Mg. Carlos A. Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice |
| topic_facet |
Bourdieu habitus horizontalidad dialógico subjetividad prácticas integrales Bourdieu habitus horizontality dialogic subjectivity integral practices |
| description |
The university extension is an academic practice that has been built through daily experiences, thus forming relationships with the territory that characterizes and that allow it to be related it with different paradigms. On the other hand, some of its peculiarities, turned into descriptors, allow it to be distinguished from the other functions such as research and teaching, which at the same time –in my opinion– allows it to be frame it into the theory of fields from Pierre Bourdieu. Besides I propose to analyze some of its characteristics, emphasizing in the imprint of the territory and those who live in it, discussing the way in which some concepts and categories such as cultural capital, trajectories, subjectivities, tensions, dialogue, horizontality, purpose, habitus, among others contribute to its demarcation, but focusings the discussion in the way that the dynamics that configure the field in its structure, allow it to establish links and articulations with other academic fields, diluting of some of the limits that differentiated them, becoming the protagonist of the integral and integrative practice, in which they converge. |
| format |
Artículo publishedVersion |
| author |
Zavaro Pérez, Mg. Carlos A. |
| author_facet |
Zavaro Pérez, Mg. Carlos A. |
| author_sort |
Zavaro Pérez, Mg. Carlos A. |
| title |
Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice |
| title_short |
Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice |
| title_full |
Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice |
| title_fullStr |
Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Field and territory of Extension as an academic practice |
| title_sort |
field and territory of extension as an academic practice |
| publisher |
Secretaría de Extensión y Bienestar Estudiantil, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/redes/article/view/10712 https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=redes&d=10712_oai |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT zavaroperezmgcarlosa fieldandterritoryofextensionasanacademicpractice AT zavaroperezmgcarlosa campoyterritoriodelaextensioncomopracticaacademica |
| _version_ |
1851375933717479424 |