The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Magnano, Fiorella
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Italiano
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires 2021
Materias:
Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Rhetoric
rhetoric
Acceso en línea:https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=10035_oai
Aporte de:
Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) de Universidad de Buenos Aires
id I28-R145-10035_oai
record_format dspace
spelling I28-R145-10035_oai2025-11-17 Magnano, Fiorella 2021-12-13 The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility. El propósito de este estudio es el de centrar la atención sobre la coexistencia, en el curso de la transmisión de la doctrina de los loci en el Alto Medioevo de dos interpretaciones, las cuales, aunque surjan ambas de un comentario a los Topica de Cicerón, han originado una diversa, aunque notable flexión interpretativa del texto ciceroniano: el primer comentario realizado por Mario Victorino (c. 280-365 d.C.), el cual concibió los loci casi exclusivamente al servicio de la Retórica, el segundo llevado a cabo por Boecio (c. 480-524 d.C.) quien, por su parte, intentó restaurar la centralidad que los Topica tuvieron en la lógica aristotélica, subordinando los loci retóricos a los loci dialécticos. Mi conclusión es que la Alta Edad Media puede ser considerada con justa razón desde un punto de vista epistemológico como una larga boetiana aetas. Aunque el corpus de los escritos de lógica boeciana no estuviera disponible sino hasta la segunda mitad del siglo XI, Boecio de algún modo continuó sosteniendo con su impostación de método el esqueleto de la nueva estructura especulativo-teológica. The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility. application/pdf application/pdf https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035 10.34096/petm.v42.n2.10035 spa ita Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035/9720 https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035/9721 Patristica et Mediævalia; Vol. 42 Núm. 2 (2021); 33-61 2683-9636 Boecio Cicerón dialéctica retórica Topica Boethius Cicero dialectic Topica Rhetoric Boethius Cicero dialectic rhetoric Topica The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages La recezione della Topica boeziana nell'Alto Medioevo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=10035_oai
institution Universidad de Buenos Aires
institution_str I-28
repository_str R-145
collection Repositorio Digital de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
language Español
Italiano
orig_language_str_mv spa
ita
topic Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
rhetoric
Topica
spellingShingle Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
rhetoric
Topica
Magnano, Fiorella
The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages
topic_facet Boecio
Cicerón
dialéctica
retórica
Topica
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
Topica
Rhetoric
Boethius
Cicero
dialectic
rhetoric
Topica
description The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
author Magnano, Fiorella
author_facet Magnano, Fiorella
author_sort Magnano, Fiorella
title The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages
title_short The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages
title_full The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages
title_fullStr The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages
title_full_unstemmed The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages
title_sort reception of boethian topics in the early middle ages
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires
publishDate 2021
url https://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/10035
https://repositoriouba.sisbi.uba.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=patris&d=10035_oai
work_keys_str_mv AT magnanofiorella thereceptionofboethiantopicsintheearlymiddleages
AT magnanofiorella larecezionedellatopicaboeziananellaltomedioevo
AT magnanofiorella receptionofboethiantopicsintheearlymiddleages
_version_ 1851375407859761152

Ejemplares similares