Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe

The article presents the advances of a research developed in a public institution of psychiatric hospitalization of Santa Fe, whose general objective is to investigate how the government of madness take place through the analysis of health care practices and policies in force mental in confinement c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barukel, Agustina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DelitoySociedad/article/view/8546
Aporte de:
id I26-R133-article-8546
record_format ojs
spelling I26-R133-article-85462020-06-11T15:49:37Z Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe Responsabilidad, peligrosidad y simulación: prácticas judiciales en una institución psiquiátrica de la provincia de Santa Fe Barukel, Agustina Judicial Practices Responsibility Dangerousness Simulation Prácticas judiciales Responsabilidad Peligrosidad Simulación The article presents the advances of a research developed in a public institution of psychiatric hospitalization of Santa Fe, whose general objective is to investigate how the government of madness take place through the analysis of health care practices and policies in force mental in confinement contexts. Particular emphasis is placed on practices that reveal the juxtaposition between healthcare interventions and custodial interventions. It describes the regulations, policies and current programs that frame the daily dynamics of people in conflict with the criminal law interned in psychiatric institutions. Three types of judicial practices are analyzed: the evaluation of responsibility, the assessment of endangerment, and the evaluation of simulation. It is concluded that the juxtaposition between the penal device and the assistance device, far from constituting a simplistic antagonism, is articulated in such a way that the functions can be inverted between one and other. In addition, the presence of patients in conflict with the criminal law causes modifications in the hospital landscape, which reinforce custodial features and tasks. This indicates that there is currently a process of penitentiarization of psychiatric hospitals. El artículo presenta los avances de una investigación desarrollada en una institución pública de internación psiquiátrica de Santa Fe, que tiene como objetivo general indagar de qué modo se ejerce el gobierno de la locura a través del análisis de las prácticas de atención y políticas vigentes en salud mental en contextos de encierro. Se hace hincapié particularmente en las prácticas que revelan la yuxtaposición entre intervenciones asistenciales del área salud y las custodiales del sistema penitenciario. Se describe la normativa, políticas y programas vigentes que encuadran la dinámica cotidiana de personas en conflicto con la ley penal internadas en instituciones psiquiátricas. Se analizan tres tipos de prácticas judiciales de las que son objeto: la evaluación de responsabilidad, la evaluación de peligrosidad, y la evaluación de simulación. Se concluye que la yuxtaposición entre dispositivo penal y dispositivo asistencial, lejos de constituirse en un antagonismo simple, se articula de modo que las funciones pueden verse invertidas entre uno y otro. Además, la presencia de pacientes en conflicto con la ley penal provoca modificaciones en el paisaje hospitalario, que refuerzan rasgos y tareas custodiales. Ello permite señalar que en la actualidad tiene lugar cierto proceso de penitenciarización de los hospitales psiquiátricos. Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2019-12-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DelitoySociedad/article/view/8546 10.14409/dys.v2i48.8546 Delito y Sociedad; Vol. 2 Núm. 48 (2019): Delito y Sociedad; 118-140 Delito y Sociedad; Vol. 2 No. 48 (2019): Delito y Sociedad; 118-140 2468-9963 0328-0101 10.14409/dys.v2i48 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DelitoySociedad/article/view/8546/12136 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DelitoySociedad/article/view/8546/12223 Derechos de autor 2019 Delito y Sociedad
institution Universidad Nacional del Litoral
institution_str I-26
repository_str R-133
container_title_str Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Judicial Practices
Responsibility
Dangerousness
Simulation
Prácticas judiciales
Responsabilidad
Peligrosidad
Simulación
spellingShingle Judicial Practices
Responsibility
Dangerousness
Simulation
Prácticas judiciales
Responsabilidad
Peligrosidad
Simulación
Barukel, Agustina
Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe
topic_facet Judicial Practices
Responsibility
Dangerousness
Simulation
Prácticas judiciales
Responsabilidad
Peligrosidad
Simulación
author Barukel, Agustina
author_facet Barukel, Agustina
author_sort Barukel, Agustina
title Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe
title_short Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe
title_full Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe
title_fullStr Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe
title_full_unstemmed Responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, Santa Fe
title_sort responsability, endangerment, simulation: judicial practices in a psychiatric hospital, santa fe
description The article presents the advances of a research developed in a public institution of psychiatric hospitalization of Santa Fe, whose general objective is to investigate how the government of madness take place through the analysis of health care practices and policies in force mental in confinement contexts. Particular emphasis is placed on practices that reveal the juxtaposition between healthcare interventions and custodial interventions. It describes the regulations, policies and current programs that frame the daily dynamics of people in conflict with the criminal law interned in psychiatric institutions. Three types of judicial practices are analyzed: the evaluation of responsibility, the assessment of endangerment, and the evaluation of simulation. It is concluded that the juxtaposition between the penal device and the assistance device, far from constituting a simplistic antagonism, is articulated in such a way that the functions can be inverted between one and other. In addition, the presence of patients in conflict with the criminal law causes modifications in the hospital landscape, which reinforce custodial features and tasks. This indicates that there is currently a process of penitentiarization of psychiatric hospitals.
publisher Universidad Nacional del Litoral
publishDate 2019
url https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DelitoySociedad/article/view/8546
work_keys_str_mv AT barukelagustina responsabilityendangermentsimulationjudicialpracticesinapsychiatrichospitalsantafe
AT barukelagustina responsabilidadpeligrosidadysimulacionpracticasjudicialesenunainstitucionpsiquiatricadelaprovinciadesantafe
first_indexed 2023-07-05T22:54:58Z
last_indexed 2023-07-05T22:54:58Z
_version_ 1770623019823136768