The coherence of conciliationism
The article discusses peer disagreement. First, an original theory is presented according to which we must distinguish between strong disagreements and weak disagreements. Such a theory is 'hybrid' in the sense that it prescribes a conciliatory reaction in one case (weak disagreements) and...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ARFIL y UNL
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8111 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I26-R133-article-8111 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I26-R133-article-81112021-03-29T08:36:37Z The coherence of conciliationism La coherencia del conciliacionismo Lo Guercio, Nicolás social epistemology,disagreement, epistemic peers, conciliationism epistemología social, desacuerdo, paridad epistémica, conciliacionismo The article discusses peer disagreement. First, an original theory is presented according to which we must distinguish between strong disagreements and weak disagreements. Such a theory is 'hybrid' in the sense that it prescribes a conciliatory reaction in one case (weak disagreements) and a steadfast reaction in the other (strong disagreements). Second, a common objection against conciliatory views is presented which poses a threat against the view above mentioned. According to the objection conciliatory views prescribe in some circumstances its own rejection. Finally, it is argued that this objection can be challenged on several grounds, hence, it represents no danger against the view defended in this article. El artículo se ocupa de la cuestión de los desacuerdos entre pares epistémicos. En primer lugar, se presenta una teoría al respecto que distingue entre desacuerdos fuertes y desacuerdos débiles. Dicha teoría es 'híbrida', en tanto prescribe una reacción conciliadora en un caso (desacuerdos débiles) y una reacción obstinada en el otro (desacuerdos fuertes). En segundo lugar, se presenta una objeción contra las posturas conciliadoras que amenaza la posición aquí defendida. De acuerdo con esta objeción, las posiciones conciliadoras prescriben en algunas circunstancias su propio rechazo. Finalmente, se ofrecen varias razones por las cuales dicha objeción puede ser impugnada, resultando así inocua contra la posición defendida en este artículo. ARFIL y UNL 2019-04-03 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8111 10.14409/topicos.v0i35.8111 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 35 (2018): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 87-119 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No. 35 (2018): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 87-119 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.v0i35 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8111/11607 Derechos de autor 2019 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| institution_str |
I-26 |
| repository_str |
R-133 |
| container_title_str |
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
social epistemology,disagreement, epistemic peers, conciliationism epistemología social, desacuerdo, paridad epistémica, conciliacionismo |
| spellingShingle |
social epistemology,disagreement, epistemic peers, conciliationism epistemología social, desacuerdo, paridad epistémica, conciliacionismo Lo Guercio, Nicolás The coherence of conciliationism |
| topic_facet |
social epistemology,disagreement, epistemic peers, conciliationism epistemología social, desacuerdo, paridad epistémica, conciliacionismo |
| author |
Lo Guercio, Nicolás |
| author_facet |
Lo Guercio, Nicolás |
| author_sort |
Lo Guercio, Nicolás |
| title |
The coherence of conciliationism |
| title_short |
The coherence of conciliationism |
| title_full |
The coherence of conciliationism |
| title_fullStr |
The coherence of conciliationism |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The coherence of conciliationism |
| title_sort |
coherence of conciliationism |
| description |
The article discusses peer disagreement. First, an original theory is presented according to which we must distinguish between strong disagreements and weak disagreements. Such a theory is 'hybrid' in the sense that it prescribes a conciliatory reaction in one case (weak disagreements) and a steadfast reaction in the other (strong disagreements). Second, a common objection against conciliatory views is presented which poses a threat against the view above mentioned. According to the objection conciliatory views prescribe in some circumstances its own rejection. Finally, it is argued that this objection can be challenged on several grounds, hence, it represents no danger against the view defended in this article. |
| publisher |
ARFIL y UNL |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/8111 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT loguercionicolas thecoherenceofconciliationism AT loguercionicolas lacoherenciadelconciliacionismo AT loguercionicolas coherenceofconciliationism |
| first_indexed |
2023-07-05T23:21:03Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-07-05T23:21:03Z |
| _version_ |
1770624660929511424 |