Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis

Starting from recognizing the lack of consideration of the analytical restrictions related to the role of the state in ECLAC’s development proposal, the article revalues ​​the specificities of the configuration and involvement practices of Latin American states in order to understand their inability...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ormaechea, Emilia, Fernández, Víctor Ramiro
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/EstudiosSociales/article/view/7658
Aporte de:
id I26-R133-article-7658
record_format ojs
spelling I26-R133-article-76582020-07-29T13:19:20Z Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis Debates sobre el estructuralismo y neo-estructuralismo latinoamericano: situando al Estado en un primer plano de análisis Ormaechea, Emilia Fernández, Víctor Ramiro State development Latin America ECLAC Estado Desarrollo América Latina CEPAL Starting from recognizing the lack of consideration of the analytical restrictions related to the role of the state in ECLAC’s development proposal, the article revalues ​​the specificities of the configuration and involvement practices of Latin American states in order to understand their inability to direct the accumulative pattern towards a structural transformation. In this sense, the practices deployed on and from the states during the period of import substitution industrialization are analysed, showing how they finally acted, on the one hand, in a functional way to the recreation of the obstacles that gave specificity to the pattern of peripheral accumulation, and, on the other hand, configuring the own weakness of the states to confront the consequent transformations of capitalism after 1970. Partiendo de reconocer el escaso abordaje de las restricciones analíticas asociadas al rol que asume el Estado en la propuesta de desarrollo cepalina, incluso por parte de los enfoques teóricos que se ocuparon de revisar las limitaciones de aquella teoría, el artículo revaloriza las especificidades de los procesos de configuración e implicación estatal para comprender la incapacidad del Estado para direccionar el patrón acumulativo hacia una transformación estructural que incorpore a la industria como motor de desarrollo. En ese sentido, se analiza cómo las prácticas desplegadas sobre y desde los mismos Estados durante el período de la industrialización por sustitución de importaciones terminaron actuando, por un lado, de manera funcional a la recreación de los obstáculos que daban especificidad al patrón de acumulación periférico, y, por otro lado, configurando la propia debilidad del Estado para afrontar las consecuentes transformaciones del capitalismo a escala global suscitadas con posterioridad a 1970. Universidad Nacional del Litoral 2020-07-16 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/EstudiosSociales/article/view/7658 10.14409/es.v58i1.7658 Estudios Sociales; Vol. 58 Núm. 1 (2020): Estudios Sociales; 231-254 Estudios Sociales; Vol. 58 No. 1 (2020): Estudios Sociales; 231-254 2250-6950 0327-4934 10.14409/es.v58i1 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/EstudiosSociales/article/view/7658/12788 Derechos de autor 2020 Estudios Sociales
institution Universidad Nacional del Litoral
institution_str I-26
repository_str R-133
container_title_str Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic State
development
Latin America
ECLAC
Estado
Desarrollo
América Latina
CEPAL
spellingShingle State
development
Latin America
ECLAC
Estado
Desarrollo
América Latina
CEPAL
Ormaechea, Emilia
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro
Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis
topic_facet State
development
Latin America
ECLAC
Estado
Desarrollo
América Latina
CEPAL
author Ormaechea, Emilia
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro
author_facet Ormaechea, Emilia
Fernández, Víctor Ramiro
author_sort Ormaechea, Emilia
title Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis
title_short Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis
title_full Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis
title_fullStr Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis
title_full_unstemmed Debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the State at the forefront of the analysis
title_sort debates on latinamerican structuralism and neo-structuralism: placing the state at the forefront of the analysis
description Starting from recognizing the lack of consideration of the analytical restrictions related to the role of the state in ECLAC’s development proposal, the article revalues ​​the specificities of the configuration and involvement practices of Latin American states in order to understand their inability to direct the accumulative pattern towards a structural transformation. In this sense, the practices deployed on and from the states during the period of import substitution industrialization are analysed, showing how they finally acted, on the one hand, in a functional way to the recreation of the obstacles that gave specificity to the pattern of peripheral accumulation, and, on the other hand, configuring the own weakness of the states to confront the consequent transformations of capitalism after 1970.
publisher Universidad Nacional del Litoral
publishDate 2020
url https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/EstudiosSociales/article/view/7658
work_keys_str_mv AT ormaecheaemilia debatesonlatinamericanstructuralismandneostructuralismplacingthestateattheforefrontoftheanalysis
AT fernandezvictorramiro debatesonlatinamericanstructuralismandneostructuralismplacingthestateattheforefrontoftheanalysis
AT ormaecheaemilia debatessobreelestructuralismoyneoestructuralismolatinoamericanosituandoalestadoenunprimerplanodeanalisis
AT fernandezvictorramiro debatessobreelestructuralismoyneoestructuralismolatinoamericanosituandoalestadoenunprimerplanodeanalisis
first_indexed 2023-07-05T23:13:06Z
last_indexed 2023-07-05T23:13:06Z
_version_ 1770624161642708992