Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry

With the cogito ergo sum, Descartes has intended to offer a safe ground for the construction of scientific knowledge. Nevertheless, the problematic thus posed has totally forgotten, as Heidegger points out, to elucidate the sense of the being of this sum. It can be said that the whole work of Miche...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lipsitz, Mario
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: ARFIL y UNL 2018
Materias:
Descartes
affectivity
intuicionism
Michael Henry
afectividad
intuicionismo
Michel Henry
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/7472
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) de Universidad Nacional del Litoral
id I26-R133-article-7472
record_format ojs
spelling I26-R133-article-74722021-03-29T08:37:56Z Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry Lipsitz, Mario Descartes affectivity intuicionism Michael Henry Descartes afectividad intuicionismo Michel Henry With the cogito ergo sum, Descartes has intended to offer a safe ground for the construction of scientific knowledge. Nevertheless, the problematic thus posed has totally forgotten, as Heidegger points out, to elucidate the sense of the being of this sum. It can be said that the whole work of Michel Henry constitutes a deeply original attempt to raise the question of the ego sum on a truthfully ontological context. Hence, his meditation on Descartes work and project takes up a central and permanent place in his work. Henry discovers to us in L’essence de la Manifestation (1964) and in Phénoménologie du Corps (1965) a Descartes whose project, based unreflectively on an intuitionist procedure, identifies truth with evidence and thus predetermines his investigation as an impossible attempt to exhibit the grounding under light, which is impossible, given that the grounding, the being of the ego — Henry states-, is invisible. This is what Descartes has understood, according to Henry’s  “Généalogie de la Psychanalysé9” (1985): the being of the sum is not a  “that” which may be given by a vision but a  “how” that reveals itself without any mediation as pathos-, the appearing of life to itself in the immanence of its affectivity. Con el ego cogito sum, Descartes ha buscado ofrecer un suelo seguro para la edificación del conocimiento científico. Sin embargo, la problemática así instaurada ha olvidado totalmente, como señala Heidegger, elucidar el sentido de ser de ese sum. Puede decirse que toda la obra de Michel Henry constituye una tentativa profundamente original de plantear la cuestión del ego sum sobre un contexto verdaderamente ontológico. Es en esta medida que su meditación sobre la obra y el proyecto cartesiano ocupa un lugar central y permanente. Henry nos descubre en L'essence de la Manifestation (1964) y en Phénoménologie du Corps un Descartes cuyo proyecto, basado irreflexivamente sobre un procedimiento intuicionista identifica verdad con evidencia y predetermina así su investigación como una imposible tentativa de exhibir el fundamento bajo la luz. Imposible, pues el fundamento, afirma Henry, el ser del ego, es invisible. Esto es lo que ha comprendido el Descartes al que nos abre Henry en su “Généalogie de la Psychanalyse” (1985): el ser del sum no es un “qué” susceptible de ser dado por un ver sino un “como” que se revela sin mediación a sí mismo como pathos: el aparecerse a si de la vida en la inmanencia de su afectividad. ARFIL y UNL 2018-06-28 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/7472 10.14409/topicos.v0i14.7472 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 14 (2006): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 23-50 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No. 14 (2006): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; 23-50 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.v0i14 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/7472/10839 Derechos de autor 2018 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe
institution Universidad Nacional del Litoral
institution_str I-26
repository_str R-133
container_title_str Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Descartes
affectivity
intuicionism
Michael Henry
Descartes
afectividad
intuicionismo
Michel Henry
spellingShingle Descartes
affectivity
intuicionism
Michael Henry
Descartes
afectividad
intuicionismo
Michel Henry
Lipsitz, Mario
Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry
topic_facet Descartes
affectivity
intuicionism
Michael Henry
Descartes
afectividad
intuicionismo
Michel Henry
author Lipsitz, Mario
author_facet Lipsitz, Mario
author_sort Lipsitz, Mario
title Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry
title_short Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry
title_full Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry
title_fullStr Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry
title_full_unstemmed Vida y subjetividad: Los Descartes de Michel Henry
title_sort vida y subjetividad: los descartes de michel henry
description With the cogito ergo sum, Descartes has intended to offer a safe ground for the construction of scientific knowledge. Nevertheless, the problematic thus posed has totally forgotten, as Heidegger points out, to elucidate the sense of the being of this sum. It can be said that the whole work of Michel Henry constitutes a deeply original attempt to raise the question of the ego sum on a truthfully ontological context. Hence, his meditation on Descartes work and project takes up a central and permanent place in his work. Henry discovers to us in L’essence de la Manifestation (1964) and in Phénoménologie du Corps (1965) a Descartes whose project, based unreflectively on an intuitionist procedure, identifies truth with evidence and thus predetermines his investigation as an impossible attempt to exhibit the grounding under light, which is impossible, given that the grounding, the being of the ego — Henry states-, is invisible. This is what Descartes has understood, according to Henry’s  “Généalogie de la Psychanalysé9” (1985): the being of the sum is not a  “that” which may be given by a vision but a  “how” that reveals itself without any mediation as pathos-, the appearing of life to itself in the immanence of its affectivity.
publisher ARFIL y UNL
publishDate 2018
url https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/7472
work_keys_str_mv AT lipsitzmario vidaysubjetividadlosdescartesdemichelhenry
first_indexed 2023-07-05T23:20:36Z
last_indexed 2023-07-05T23:20:36Z
_version_ 1770624632594890752

Ejemplares similares