La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91
The manuscript tradition of Calpurnius Siculus is divided mainly into two families: one of them, on which were based most editions until the beginning of the 19th century, comprises around thirty codices recentiores (known as V); the other is represented by two codices of the 15th century (NG), whos...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Ediciones UNL
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14373 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I26-R133-article-14373 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I26-R133-article-143732025-07-31T17:34:01Z La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 Ventura, Mariana Poesía bucólica romana postvirgiliana Calpurnio Sículo Ecl. 3. 91 Crítica textual Postvirgilian Roman bucolic poetry Calpurnius Siculus Ecl. 3. 91 Textual criticism The manuscript tradition of Calpurnius Siculus is divided mainly into two families: one of them, on which were based most editions until the beginning of the 19th century, comprises around thirty codices recentiores (known as V); the other is represented by two codices of the 15th century (NG), whose importance was stressed by modern critical editions. There is one more codex, the Parisinus 8049 (P), from the XIIth or XIIIth century, whose place in the stemma is still under discussion: some philologists derive it from the same family as the codices recentiores, while others consider it as a third branch of the tradition. According to Reeve (1978:229-230), the answer to this question relies on the explanation of two variants. In this paper, I aim at discussing one of them.In Calpurnius’ third eclogue, Lycidas, who has been left by his lover Phyllis after a violent quarrel, tries to recover her by means of a love letter. At the end of the letter, fearing that his lover may replace him by his rival Mopsus, the shepherd threatens to commit suicide and fantasizes about a funerary epigram (vv. 90-91), which in different modern editions takes the following form: Credere, pastores, levibus nolite puellis; / Phyllida Mopsus habet, Lycidan habet ultima rerum. The text raises some critical problems, among them, in the first verb of v. 91, the variant habet NG / amat VP. In my view, the manner in which the love relationship is characterized along the whole poem supports the correction of amat. Accordingly, this reading is not to be considered a conjunctive error. La tradición manuscrita de Calpurnio Sículo se divide fundamentalmente en dos familias: una, integrada por alrededor de treinta códices recentiores (reunidos bajo la sigla V), en la que se basaron todas las ediciones del autor hasta comienzos del siglo XIX; otra, integrada por dos códices del siglo XV (NG), cuya importancia fue puesta de relieve por las ediciones críticas modernas. A estas dos familias se suma un códice más, el Parisinus 8049 (P), del siglo XII-XIII, cuyo lugar en el stemma es discutido: para algunos filólogos se desprende del mismo hiparquetipo que los códices recentiores, mientras que para otros constituye una tercera rama de la tradición. Según Reeve (1978:229-230) la respuesta al problema depende de la explicación de dos variantes. En este artículo nos proponemos discutir una de ellas.En la égloga 3 de Calpurnio, Lícidas, abandonado por su amada Filis tras una violenta disputa, intenta recuperar a la joven por medio de una carta. Al final del texto, ante la posibilidad de ser reemplazado por Mopso, su rival, el pastor amenaza con suicidarse y fantasea con un epigrama funerario (vv. 90-91), que en diversas ediciones modernas adopta la forma siguiente: Credere, pastores, levibus nolite puellis; / Phyllida Mopsus habet, Lycidan habet ultima rerum. El texto presenta varios problemas críticos, entre ellos la variante habet NG / amat VP en el primer registro del verbo en el v. 91. A nuestro juicio, la manera en que se caracteriza la relación amorosa entre los personajes a lo largo del poema habla a favor de la lección amat que, por ende, no constituye un error conjuntivo de VP. Ediciones UNL 2025-07-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/epub+zip https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14373 10.14409/op.2025.3.e0026 Ordia Prima; Núm. 3 (2025): Ordia Prima; e0026 3008-8380 1666-7743 10.14409/op.2025.3 es https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14373/20502 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14373/20503 Derechos de autor 2025 Mariana Ventura https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral |
| institution_str |
I-26 |
| repository_str |
R-133 |
| container_title_str |
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Poesía bucólica romana postvirgiliana Calpurnio Sículo Ecl. 3. 91 Crítica textual Postvirgilian Roman bucolic poetry Calpurnius Siculus Ecl. 3. 91 Textual criticism |
| spellingShingle |
Poesía bucólica romana postvirgiliana Calpurnio Sículo Ecl. 3. 91 Crítica textual Postvirgilian Roman bucolic poetry Calpurnius Siculus Ecl. 3. 91 Textual criticism Ventura, Mariana La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 |
| topic_facet |
Poesía bucólica romana postvirgiliana Calpurnio Sículo Ecl. 3. 91 Crítica textual Postvirgilian Roman bucolic poetry Calpurnius Siculus Ecl. 3. 91 Textual criticism |
| author |
Ventura, Mariana |
| author_facet |
Ventura, Mariana |
| author_sort |
Ventura, Mariana |
| title |
La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 |
| title_short |
La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 |
| title_full |
La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 |
| title_fullStr |
La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La variante habet / amat en Calpurnio Sículo, Ecl. 3. 91 |
| title_sort |
la variante habet / amat en calpurnio sículo, ecl. 3. 91 |
| description |
The manuscript tradition of Calpurnius Siculus is divided mainly into two families: one of them, on which were based most editions until the beginning of the 19th century, comprises around thirty codices recentiores (known as V); the other is represented by two codices of the 15th century (NG), whose importance was stressed by modern critical editions. There is one more codex, the Parisinus 8049 (P), from the XIIth or XIIIth century, whose place in the stemma is still under discussion: some philologists derive it from the same family as the codices recentiores, while others consider it as a third branch of the tradition. According to Reeve (1978:229-230), the answer to this question relies on the explanation of two variants. In this paper, I aim at discussing one of them.In Calpurnius’ third eclogue, Lycidas, who has been left by his lover Phyllis after a violent quarrel, tries to recover her by means of a love letter. At the end of the letter, fearing that his lover may replace him by his rival Mopsus, the shepherd threatens to commit suicide and fantasizes about a funerary epigram (vv. 90-91), which in different modern editions takes the following form: Credere, pastores, levibus nolite puellis; / Phyllida Mopsus habet, Lycidan habet ultima rerum. The text raises some critical problems, among them, in the first verb of v. 91, the variant habet NG / amat VP. In my view, the manner in which the love relationship is characterized along the whole poem supports the correction of amat. Accordingly, this reading is not to be considered a conjunctive error. |
| publisher |
Ediciones UNL |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| url |
https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/index/article/view/14373 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT venturamariana lavariantehabetamatencalpurniosiculoecl391 |
| first_indexed |
2025-09-15T05:02:14Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-09-15T05:02:14Z |
| _version_ |
1843304893798940672 |