Ideología, gramática y discurso: análisis y caracterización de la realización de significados ideacionales, interpersonales y textuales en diferentes expresiones –sincrónicas y diacrónicas– de los discursos sociales
In the field of humanities and social sciences, since the last half of the 20th century, the constitutive dimension of language in the human-world relationship has been strengthened, as well as the recognition of the symbolically mediated character of consciousness, which has allowed reformulate fro...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional del Litoral
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/DeSignosySentidos/article/view/10817 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the field of humanities and social sciences, since the last half of the 20th century, the constitutive dimension of language in the human-world relationship has been strengthened, as well as the recognition of the symbolically mediated character of consciousness, which has allowed reformulate from different theoretical positions, classic problems referred to the relationships between the social structure, the cultural context and the social discourses that cross them. The conceptual development of the LSF considers that human language is organized from three metafunctions. These metafunctions are an abstraction to explain the universal nature of language and are the following: the ideative metafunction that is performed in the lexicon-grammar of a language through the system of Transitivity, the interpersonal metafunction that is performed in the lexico-grammar to through the mode / remainder system and the textual metafunction that is carried out in the Lexico-grammar through the theme-rema system. From this uninterrupted development, the LSF has today become a powerful theoretical framework for the analysis of various discursive genres. This project is organized through three paths, the first two respond to a diachronic dimension of the texts and discourses, the third focuses on the synchronic dimensión. |
|---|