Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?

This work aims to analyze the phenomenon of motivation in deliberation, taking up the idea present in the article “Practical Reason and Motivations for Public Deliberation” (Vidiella, 2017) which maintains that classical deliberative theory presents a “motivational deficit”. Todo this I will focus o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Flores, María Fernanda
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: ARFIL y UNL 2023
Materias:
Deliberation
Motivation
Reasons
Emotions
Cognitivism
Deliberación
Motivación
Razones
Emociones
Cognitivismo
Acceso en línea:https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10408
Aporte de:
Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL) de Universidad Nacional del Litoral
id I26-R133-article-10408
record_format ojs
spelling I26-R133-article-104082023-12-15T12:21:22Z Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions? Motivación y deliberación: ¿cómo se expresa esta relación en la transformación de las opiniones deliberativas? Flores, María Fernanda Deliberation Motivation Reasons Emotions Cognitivism Deliberación Motivación Razones Emociones Cognitivismo This work aims to analyze the phenomenon of motivation in deliberation, taking up the idea present in the article “Practical Reason and Motivations for Public Deliberation” (Vidiella, 2017) which maintains that classical deliberative theory presents a “motivational deficit”. Todo this I will focus on the transformation of opinions. I will take into account how opinions are conceived from the perspective of rationalism, introducing an alternative view that takes the emotional aspect as relevant. Then I will favor the possibility of transformation ofopinions, and finally I will refer to the idea that rationalism can even include the motivational aspect. Taking distance from Vidiella which refers to advances in moral psychology and studies on the cognitive role of emotions, I will mainly focus on the critiques to some assumptions of rationalism that propose to make certain conditions of deliberation more flexible. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el fenómeno de la motivación en la deliberación, retomando la idea del artículo “Razón práctica y motivaciones para la deliberación pública” (Vidiella, 2017) que sostiene que la teoría deliberativa clásica presenta un “déficit motivacional”. Para ello me centraré en la transformación de las opiniones. Tendré en cuenta cómo se conciben las opiniones desde un punto de vista racionalista, mostrando una alternativa que otorga relevancia al aspecto emocional. Luego argumentaré a favor de la posibilidad de transformación de las opiniones, y por último haré referencia a la idea de que el racionalismo puede llegar a incluir el aspecto motivacional. Para ello a diferencia Vidiella que remite a los avances en psicología moral y a los estudios sobre el papel cognitivo de las emociones, me basaré principalmente en algunas críticas a los presupuestos del racionalismo que proponen flexibilizar ciertas condiciones que funcionan como principios de la deliberación. ARFIL y UNL 2023-03-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/zip https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10408 10.14409/topicos.2023.45.e0023 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; Núm. 45 (2023): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; e0023 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; No. 45 (2023): Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe; e0023 1668-723X 1666-485X 10.14409/topicos.2023.45 spa https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10408/17185 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10408/17186 https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10408/17187 Derechos de autor 2023 Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía de Santa Fe
institution Universidad Nacional del Litoral
institution_str I-26
repository_str R-133
container_title_str Biblioteca Virtual - Publicaciones (UNL)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Deliberation
Motivation
Reasons
Emotions
Cognitivism
Deliberación
Motivación
Razones
Emociones
Cognitivismo
spellingShingle Deliberation
Motivation
Reasons
Emotions
Cognitivism
Deliberación
Motivación
Razones
Emociones
Cognitivismo
Flores, María Fernanda
Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?
topic_facet Deliberation
Motivation
Reasons
Emotions
Cognitivism
Deliberación
Motivación
Razones
Emociones
Cognitivismo
author Flores, María Fernanda
author_facet Flores, María Fernanda
author_sort Flores, María Fernanda
title Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?
title_short Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?
title_full Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?
title_fullStr Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?
title_full_unstemmed Motivation and Deliberation: How is This Relationship Expressed in the Transformation of Deliberative Opinions?
title_sort motivation and deliberation: how is this relationship expressed in the transformation of deliberative opinions?
description This work aims to analyze the phenomenon of motivation in deliberation, taking up the idea present in the article “Practical Reason and Motivations for Public Deliberation” (Vidiella, 2017) which maintains that classical deliberative theory presents a “motivational deficit”. Todo this I will focus on the transformation of opinions. I will take into account how opinions are conceived from the perspective of rationalism, introducing an alternative view that takes the emotional aspect as relevant. Then I will favor the possibility of transformation ofopinions, and finally I will refer to the idea that rationalism can even include the motivational aspect. Taking distance from Vidiella which refers to advances in moral psychology and studies on the cognitive role of emotions, I will mainly focus on the critiques to some assumptions of rationalism that propose to make certain conditions of deliberation more flexible.
publisher ARFIL y UNL
publishDate 2023
url https://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/Topicos/article/view/10408
work_keys_str_mv AT floresmariafernanda motivationanddeliberationhowisthisrelationshipexpressedinthetransformationofdeliberativeopinions
AT floresmariafernanda motivacionydeliberacioncomoseexpresaestarelacionenlatransformaciondelasopinionesdeliberativas
first_indexed 2023-03-18T23:06:07Z
last_indexed 2024-08-13T20:39:52Z
_version_ 1807306291537772544

Ejemplares similares