(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Articulo article acceptedVersion |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
International Association for Plant Taxonomy
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208 https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12469 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12469 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I22-R178-uncomaid-16208 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
Universidad Nacional del Comahue |
institution_str |
I-22 |
repository_str |
R-178 |
collection |
Repositorio Institucional UNCo |
language |
Inglés |
topic |
Botánica Nomenclatura botánica Código internacional de nomenclatura Foro de discusión Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales Ciencias Puras Ciencias Aplicadas |
spellingShingle |
Botánica Nomenclatura botánica Código internacional de nomenclatura Foro de discusión Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales Ciencias Puras Ciencias Aplicadas Jocou, Adriel Ian (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
topic_facet |
Botánica Nomenclatura botánica Código internacional de nomenclatura Foro de discusión Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales Ciencias Puras Ciencias Aplicadas |
description |
Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates when the misused term “holotype” can be corrected, there is no Example illustrating when the term cannot be corrected. Although Art. 7.11 is clear, and a typification statement on or after 1 January 2001 must include the phrase “designated here” or an equivalent, adding an Example after Art. 9 Note 6 could be clarifying. Hence, I feel that the following new Example should be included in the Code. |
format |
Articulo article acceptedVersion |
author |
Jocou, Adriel Ian |
author_facet |
Jocou, Adriel Ian |
author_sort |
Jocou, Adriel Ian |
title |
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
title_short |
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
title_full |
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
title_fullStr |
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
title_full_unstemmed |
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
title_sort |
(070) proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected |
publisher |
International Association for Plant Taxonomy |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208 https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12469 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12469 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jocouadrielian 070proposaltoaddanewexampleafterarticle9note6toillustratewhenthetermholotypecannotbecorrected |
bdutipo_str |
Repositorios |
_version_ |
1764820506150699008 |