(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected

Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jocou, Adriel Ian
Formato: Articulo article acceptedVersion
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Association for Plant Taxonomy 2021
Materias:
Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
Acceso en línea:http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208
Aporte de:
Repositorio Institucional UNCo de Universidad Nacional del Comahue
id I22-R178-uncomaid-16208
record_format dspace
spelling I22-R178-uncomaid-162082023-05-23T13:56:49Z (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected Jocou, Adriel Ian Botánica Nomenclatura botánica Código internacional de nomenclatura Foro de discusión Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales Ciencias Puras Ciencias Aplicadas Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates when the misused term “holotype” can be corrected, there is no Example illustrating when the term cannot be corrected. Although Art. 7.11 is clear, and a typification statement on or after 1 January 2001 must include the phrase “designated here” or an equivalent, adding an Example after Art. 9 Note 6 could be clarifying. Hence, I feel that the following new Example should be included in the Code. Fil: Jocou, Adriel Ian. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Departamento de Biología Aplicada; Argentina. 2021-04-17 2021-04-22T17:03:29Z 2021-04-22T17:03:29Z Articulo article acceptedVersion http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208 1996-8175 eng https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12469 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12469 Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Argentina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ application/pdf pp. 453 application/pdf International Association for Plant Taxonomy Taxon 70 (2), abril 2021
institution Universidad Nacional del Comahue
institution_str I-22
repository_str R-178
collection Repositorio Institucional UNCo
language Inglés
topic Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
spellingShingle Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
Jocou, Adriel Ian
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
topic_facet Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
description Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates when the misused term “holotype” can be corrected, there is no Example illustrating when the term cannot be corrected. Although Art. 7.11 is clear, and a typification statement on or after 1 January 2001 must include the phrase “designated here” or an equivalent, adding an Example after Art. 9 Note 6 could be clarifying. Hence, I feel that the following new Example should be included in the Code.
format Articulo
article
acceptedVersion
author Jocou, Adriel Ian
author_facet Jocou, Adriel Ian
author_sort Jocou, Adriel Ian
title (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_short (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_full (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_fullStr (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_full_unstemmed (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_sort (070) proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
publisher International Association for Plant Taxonomy
publishDate 2021
url http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208
work_keys_str_mv AT jocouadrielian 070proposaltoaddanewexampleafterarticle9note6toillustratewhenthetermholotypecannotbecorrected
_version_ 1807224397445988352

Ejemplares similares