(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected

Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Jocou, Adriel Ian
Formato: Articulo article acceptedVersion
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Association for Plant Taxonomy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12469
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12469
Aporte de:
id I22-R178-uncomaid-16208
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional del Comahue
institution_str I-22
repository_str R-178
collection Repositorio Institucional UNCo
language Inglés
topic Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
spellingShingle Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
Jocou, Adriel Ian
(070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
topic_facet Botánica
Nomenclatura botánica
Código internacional de nomenclatura
Foro de discusión
Ciencias de la Tierra y Medio Ambiente
Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
Ciencias Puras
Ciencias Aplicadas
description Some confusion may arise regarding the application of Art. 9.10 of the Shenzhen Code (Turland & al. in Regnum Veg. 159. 2018). When the term “holotype”is misused, it can be corrected (to lecto-, neo-or epitype). For this, the requirements of Art. 7.11 must be met. While Art. 9 Ex. 11 illustrates when the misused term “holotype” can be corrected, there is no Example illustrating when the term cannot be corrected. Although Art. 7.11 is clear, and a typification statement on or after 1 January 2001 must include the phrase “designated here” or an equivalent, adding an Example after Art. 9 Note 6 could be clarifying. Hence, I feel that the following new Example should be included in the Code.
format Articulo
article
acceptedVersion
author Jocou, Adriel Ian
author_facet Jocou, Adriel Ian
author_sort Jocou, Adriel Ian
title (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_short (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_full (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_fullStr (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_full_unstemmed (070) Proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
title_sort (070) proposal to add a new example after article 9 note 6 to illustrate when the term “holotype” cannot be corrected
publisher International Association for Plant Taxonomy
publishDate 2021
url http://rdi.uncoma.edu.ar/handle/uncomaid/16208
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12469
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tax.12469
work_keys_str_mv AT jocouadrielian 070proposaltoaddanewexampleafterarticle9note6toillustratewhenthetermholotypecannotbecorrected
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820506150699008