On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo

Plato's Phaedo can be approached taking as its axis the question of opposites, which runs through it in all its extension. In this paper we will focus on the reference to pleasure and pain with which Socrates opens his participation in the work, as well as on the first argument dedicated precis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Casnati, Maria Gabriela
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Humanidades UNCo 2023
Materias:
Opposites
Phaedo
Plato
Plaeasure
Pain
Opuestos
Fedón
Platón
Placer
Dolor
Acceso en línea:https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/filosofia/article/view/5551
Aporte de:
Repositorio de Revistas Electrónicas REVELE (UNComahue) de Universidad Nacional del Comahue
id I22-R128-article-5551
record_format ojs
spelling I22-R128-article-55512024-12-03T15:48:52Z On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo Sobre Placer- Dolor y otros opuestos en el Fedón de Platón Casnati, Maria Gabriela Opposites Phaedo Plato Plaeasure Pain Opuestos Fedón Platón Placer Dolor Plato's Phaedo can be approached taking as its axis the question of opposites, which runs through it in all its extension. In this paper we will focus on the reference to pleasure and pain with which Socrates opens his participation in the work, as well as on the first argument dedicated precisely to the cyclical nature of opposites. We will examine the wide range of qualitatively different examples of opposites that Plato offers and how those differences impact on the value of argumentation. Our analysis will allow us to formulate some appreciations of Platonic interest in these developments which, for their proper interpretation, must be read in the light of the fundamental ontological distinction between the sensible and the intelligible, presented for the first time in this dialogue. Only after being accepted by his interlocutors that it is necessary that opposites can coexist and alternate in order to explain the change in what is generated, Plato will be able to refer to the very determinations that the things designated by them receive, those very opposites that could never become opposites of themselves. It is only from this anticipation, we believe, that the importance given by Plato to the question of opposites in the Phaedo can be justly dimension. El Fedón de Platón puede ser abordado tomando como eje la cuestión de los opuestos, que lo recorre en toda su extensión. En el presente trabajo nos enfocaremos en la referencia al placer y al dolor con la que Sócrates abre su participación en la obra, así como también en el primer argumento dedicado justamente al carácter cíclico de los opuestos. Examinaremos la amplia gama de ejemplos cualitativamente diferentes de contrarios que Platón ofrece y cómo esas diferencias repercuten en el valor de la argumentación. Nuestro análisis nos permitirá formular algunas apreciaciones del interés platónico en estos desarrollos que, para su adecuada interpretación, deben ser leídos a la luz de la distinción ontológica fundamental entre lo sensible y lo inteligible, presentada por primera vez en esta obra. Solo tras conseguir la aceptación de sus interlocutores acerca de que es necesario que los opuestos pueden coexistir y alternarse para explicar el cambio en lo generado, Platón podrá referirse a las determinaciones mismas que reciben las cosas por ellas designadas, aquellos contrarios mismos que no podrían llegar a ser nunca contrarios de sí mismos. Solo desde esta anticipación, creemos, se podrá dimensionar con justicia la importancia que dio Platón a la cuestión de los opuestos en el Fedón.       Facultad de Humanidades UNCo 2023-12-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf text/html https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/filosofia/article/view/5551 ark:/s18537960/umo4vkxkj Páginas de Filosofía; Vol. 24 No. 27 (2023); 104-126 Páginas de Filosofía; Vol. 24 Núm. 27 (2023); 104-126 1853-7960 0327-5108 spa https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/filosofia/article/view/5551/62458 https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/filosofia/article/view/5551/62519 Derechos de autor 2024 Páginas de Filosofía https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional del Comahue
institution_str I-22
repository_str R-128
container_title_str Repositorio de Revistas Electrónicas REVELE (UNComahue)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Opposites
Phaedo
Plato
Plaeasure
Pain
Opuestos
Fedón
Platón
Placer
Dolor
spellingShingle Opposites
Phaedo
Plato
Plaeasure
Pain
Opuestos
Fedón
Platón
Placer
Dolor
Casnati, Maria Gabriela
On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo
topic_facet Opposites
Phaedo
Plato
Plaeasure
Pain
Opuestos
Fedón
Platón
Placer
Dolor
author Casnati, Maria Gabriela
author_facet Casnati, Maria Gabriela
author_sort Casnati, Maria Gabriela
title On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo
title_short On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo
title_full On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo
title_fullStr On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo
title_full_unstemmed On Pleasure-Pain And Other Opposites In Plato's Phaedo
title_sort on pleasure-pain and other opposites in plato's phaedo
description Plato's Phaedo can be approached taking as its axis the question of opposites, which runs through it in all its extension. In this paper we will focus on the reference to pleasure and pain with which Socrates opens his participation in the work, as well as on the first argument dedicated precisely to the cyclical nature of opposites. We will examine the wide range of qualitatively different examples of opposites that Plato offers and how those differences impact on the value of argumentation. Our analysis will allow us to formulate some appreciations of Platonic interest in these developments which, for their proper interpretation, must be read in the light of the fundamental ontological distinction between the sensible and the intelligible, presented for the first time in this dialogue. Only after being accepted by his interlocutors that it is necessary that opposites can coexist and alternate in order to explain the change in what is generated, Plato will be able to refer to the very determinations that the things designated by them receive, those very opposites that could never become opposites of themselves. It is only from this anticipation, we believe, that the importance given by Plato to the question of opposites in the Phaedo can be justly dimension.
publisher Facultad de Humanidades UNCo
publishDate 2023
url https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/filosofia/article/view/5551
work_keys_str_mv AT casnatimariagabriela onpleasurepainandotheroppositesinplatosphaedo
AT casnatimariagabriela sobreplacerdoloryotrosopuestosenelfedondeplaton
first_indexed 2025-02-05T23:00:28Z
last_indexed 2025-02-05T23:00:28Z
_version_ 1823260204213469184

Ejemplares similares