Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)

Between the mid-1950s and the 1970s in Argentina, planning was institutionalized as a State discipline while it was oriented towards the progress of industry. In this sense, developmentalism as a theoretical model that, in those years, generally guided public policies amalgamated, not without certai...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Camila Costa
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Economía y Administración 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernos/article/view/5079
Aporte de:
id I22-R128-article-5079
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional del Comahue
institution_str I-22
repository_str R-128
container_title_str Repositorio de Revistas Electrónicas REVELE (UNComahue)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic STATE
INDUSTRIALIZATION
ENERGY
TRANSPORT
INFRAESTRUCTURE
ESTADO
INDUSTRIALIZACION
ENERGIA
TRANSPORTE
INFRAESTRUCTURA
spellingShingle STATE
INDUSTRIALIZATION
ENERGY
TRANSPORT
INFRAESTRUCTURE
ESTADO
INDUSTRIALIZACION
ENERGIA
TRANSPORTE
INFRAESTRUCTURA
Camila Costa
Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)
topic_facet STATE
INDUSTRIALIZATION
ENERGY
TRANSPORT
INFRAESTRUCTURE
ESTADO
INDUSTRIALIZACION
ENERGIA
TRANSPORTE
INFRAESTRUCTURA
author Camila Costa
author_facet Camila Costa
author_sort Camila Costa
title Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)
title_short Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)
title_full Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)
title_fullStr Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)
title_full_unstemmed Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977)
title_sort alcanzar el desarrollo. la planificación de obras en argentina (1958-1977)
description Between the mid-1950s and the 1970s in Argentina, planning was institutionalized as a State discipline while it was oriented towards the progress of industry. In this sense, developmentalism as a theoretical model that, in those years, generally guided public policies amalgamated, not without certain nuances in each period of government, planning and industrialization, promoting energy self-sufficiency and summoning foreign capital. Through the development plans, the will and interests of the State were brought together and architectural and infrastructure works were proposed for the three sectors of the economy thatwere fundamental and synergistic to the industrialization process: industry, energy and transportation.This article aims to inquire how the selected economic sectors manifested themselves in works proposals, which lines of action predominated and which construction programs were protagonists of developmentalism public policies. For this, the literature that addressed economic planning in those years was reviewed and the proposals for works for industry, energy and transport were registered (manufacturing plants, hydroelectric plants, bridges and bus terminals were listed, among other construction programs) in the plans prepared by CONADE and INPE, as well as the speeches of President Frondizi that allowed covering the time frame of the study period.The procedure made it possible to establish how the developmental model was conceived in terms of public works, linked to themes that resonate in contemporary national resource planning. While in the first half of the period the majority of the proposals were allocated to the energy sector, in the second, industry and transportation took precedence, and within the latter the decline of railway and maritime infrastructure is verified. In addition, there are works such as the expansion of the SOMISA plant and the execution of the "Chocón-Cerros Colorados" hydroelectric complex that remained permanent in the interests of the stakeholders. However, the relative coincidence in the objectives was not enough to give continuity and finally implement the plans and policies studied.
publisher Facultad de Economía y Administración
publishDate 2023
url https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernos/article/view/5079
work_keys_str_mv AT camilacosta alcanzareldesarrollolaplanificaciondeobrasenargentina19581977
first_indexed 2024-08-12T23:05:42Z
last_indexed 2024-08-12T23:05:42Z
_version_ 1807224870223740928
spelling I22-R128-article-50792023-12-14T15:12:09Z Alcanzar el desarrollo. La planificación de obras en Argentina (1958-1977) Camila Costa STATE INDUSTRIALIZATION ENERGY TRANSPORT INFRAESTRUCTURE ESTADO INDUSTRIALIZACION ENERGIA TRANSPORTE INFRAESTRUCTURA Between the mid-1950s and the 1970s in Argentina, planning was institutionalized as a State discipline while it was oriented towards the progress of industry. In this sense, developmentalism as a theoretical model that, in those years, generally guided public policies amalgamated, not without certain nuances in each period of government, planning and industrialization, promoting energy self-sufficiency and summoning foreign capital. Through the development plans, the will and interests of the State were brought together and architectural and infrastructure works were proposed for the three sectors of the economy thatwere fundamental and synergistic to the industrialization process: industry, energy and transportation.This article aims to inquire how the selected economic sectors manifested themselves in works proposals, which lines of action predominated and which construction programs were protagonists of developmentalism public policies. For this, the literature that addressed economic planning in those years was reviewed and the proposals for works for industry, energy and transport were registered (manufacturing plants, hydroelectric plants, bridges and bus terminals were listed, among other construction programs) in the plans prepared by CONADE and INPE, as well as the speeches of President Frondizi that allowed covering the time frame of the study period.The procedure made it possible to establish how the developmental model was conceived in terms of public works, linked to themes that resonate in contemporary national resource planning. While in the first half of the period the majority of the proposals were allocated to the energy sector, in the second, industry and transportation took precedence, and within the latter the decline of railway and maritime infrastructure is verified. In addition, there are works such as the expansion of the SOMISA plant and the execution of the "Chocón-Cerros Colorados" hydroelectric complex that remained permanent in the interests of the stakeholders. However, the relative coincidence in the objectives was not enough to give continuity and finally implement the plans and policies studied. Entre mediados de las décadas de 1950 y 1970 en Argentina, la planificación se institucionalizó como disciplina de Estado a la vez que se orientó al desarrollo de la industria. En este sentido, el desarrollismo como modelo teórico que orientó en general las políticas públicas en esos años amalgamó, no sin ciertos matices en cada periodo de gobierno, planificación e industrialización, promoviendo la autosuficiencia energética y convocando a los capitales extranjeros. Mediante los planes de desarrollo se reunieron las voluntades e intereses del Estado en cada momento y se propusieron obras de arquitectura e infraestructura para los tres sectores de la economía que resultaron fundamentales y sinérgicos al proceso de industrialización: industria, energía y transporte.El presente artículo propone indagar cómo se manifestaron en propuestas de obras los sectores económicos seleccionados, qué líneas de acción predominaron y qué programas constructivos resultaron protagonistas de las políticas públicas desarrollistas. Para ello se revisó la literatura que abordó la planificación económica en esos años y se registraron las propuestas de obras para industria, energía y transporte (plantas fabriles, centrales hidroeléctricas, puentes y terminales de ómnibus entre otros programas constructivos) en los planes elaborados por el CONADE y el INPE, así como en los discursos del presidente Frondizi que permitieron cubrir el arco temporal del periodo de estudio.Dicho procedimiento permitió establecer cómo fue concebido el modelo desarrollista en términos de obra pública, vinculado a temas que resuenan en la planificación contemporánea de los recursos nacionales. Mientras en la primera mitad del periodo la mayoría de las propuestas se destinaban al sector energía, en la segunda primaron industria y transporte, y dentro de este último se verifica la declinación de infraestructura ferroviaria y marítima. Obras como la ampliación de la planta de SOMISA (Sociedad Mixta Siderúrgica Argentina) y la ejecución del complejo hidroeléctrico “Chocón-Cerros Colorados” fuero un propósito constante. Aún así, la relativa coincidencia en los objetivos no fue suficiente para dar continuidad y finalmente implementar los planes y políticas estudiados. Facultad de Economía y Administración 2023-12-14 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernos/article/view/5079 Cuadernos de Investigación. Serie Economía; Núm. 12 (2023); 100-128 2408-4654 1668-6152 spa https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernos/article/view/5079/62060 Derechos de autor 2023 Cuadernos de Investigación. Serie Economía https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/