Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development
Latin America presents a very polarised scenario. Currently, one of the most remarkable patterns is the passage from the Washington Consensus, based on financial valorization, to the Commodity Consensus, based on the large-scale extraction and exportation of natural goods. The article attempts to ch...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik an den österreichischen Universitäten
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13750/pr.13750.pdf |
Aporte de: |
id |
I19-R125-Jpr13750 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
institution_str |
I-19 |
repository_str |
R-125 |
collection |
Memoria Académica - FaHCE (UNLP) |
language |
Inglés |
orig_language_str_mv |
eng |
topic |
Sociología Liberal neo-developmentalism Progressive neo-developmentalism Post-developmental thinking |
spellingShingle |
Sociología Liberal neo-developmentalism Progressive neo-developmentalism Post-developmental thinking Svampa, Maristella Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development |
topic_facet |
Sociología Liberal neo-developmentalism Progressive neo-developmentalism Post-developmental thinking |
description |
Latin America presents a very polarised scenario. Currently, one of the most remarkable patterns is the passage from the Washington Consensus, based on financial valorization, to the Commodity Consensus, based on the large-scale extraction and exportation of natural goods. The article attempts to characterise the current situation and, at the same time, aims at a presentation of different political and intellectual tendencies: liberal neo-developmentalism, progressive neo-developmentalism and post-developmental thinking. The text analyses some links between these perspectives, especially between liberal neo-developmentalism and progressive neo-developmentalism, because both imply a return to the classical understanding of development in the strong sense, that is, associated with a productivist vision and incaccurate industrialist rhetoric. Finally and against his background, it presents some general lines of contemporary post-developmental thinking. |
format |
Artículo Artículo publishedVersion |
author |
Svampa, Maristella |
author_facet |
Svampa, Maristella |
author_sort |
Svampa, Maristella |
title |
Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development |
title_short |
Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development |
title_full |
Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development |
title_fullStr |
Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development |
title_sort |
resource extractivism and alternatives: latin american perspectives on development |
publisher |
Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik an den österreichischen Universitäten |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13750/pr.13750.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT svampamaristella resourceextractivismandalternativeslatinamericanperspectivesondevelopment |
bdutipo_str |
Repositorios |
_version_ |
1764820499053936640 |