The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

Evaluative sentences (moral judgments, expressions of taste, epistemic modals) are relative to the speaker's standards. Lately, a phenomenon has challenged the traditional explanation of this relativity: whenever two speakers disagree over them they contradict each other without being at fault....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Díaz Legaspe, Justina
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Filosofía
Contextualism
Disagreement
Relativism
Semantics
Relativismo
Contextualismo
Desacordo
Semântica
Acceso en línea:https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13585/pr.13585.pdf
Aporte de:
Memoria Académica - FaHCE (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R125-Jpr13585
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-125
collection Memoria Académica - FaHCE (UNLP)
language Inglés
orig_language_str_mv eng
topic Filosofía
Contextualism
Disagreement
Relativism
Semantics
Relativismo
Contextualismo
Desacordo
Semântica
spellingShingle Filosofía
Contextualism
Disagreement
Relativism
Semantics
Relativismo
Contextualismo
Desacordo
Semântica
Díaz Legaspe, Justina
The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
topic_facet Filosofía
Contextualism
Disagreement
Relativism
Semantics
Relativismo
Contextualismo
Desacordo
Semântica
description Evaluative sentences (moral judgments, expressions of taste, epistemic modals) are relative to the speaker's standards. Lately, a phenomenon has challenged the traditional explanation of this relativity: whenever two speakers disagree over them they contradict each other without being at fault. Hence, it is thought that the correction of the assertions involved must be relative to an unprivileged standard not necessarily the speaker's. I will claim instead that so far, neither this nor any other proposal has provided an explanation of the phenomenon. I will point out several problems presented by them and I will hint to how this phenomenon could be explained by making minor adjustments to our semantic theory.
format Artículo
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author_facet Díaz Legaspe, Justina
author_sort Díaz Legaspe, Justina
title The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
title_short The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
title_full The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
title_fullStr The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
title_full_unstemmed The relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
title_sort relativity of evaluative sentences: disagreeing over disagreement
publishDate 2013
url https://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/art_revistas/pr.13585/pr.13585.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT diazlegaspejustina therelativityofevaluativesentencesdisagreeingoverdisagreement
AT diazlegaspejustina relativityofevaluativesentencesdisagreeingoverdisagreement
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820498776064001

Ejemplares similares