Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis

This paper makes two contributions to the debate on the compatibility of social cost benefit analysis and economic impact analysis. First we argue that benefits estimated through economic impact analysis are amenable to subsequent analysis in a social cost benefit framework when household utility is...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banerjee, Onil, Cicowiez, Martín, Moreda, Adela
Formato: Articulo Documento de trabajo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Ciencias Económicas
economic impact analysis
social cost benefit analysis
Uruguay
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/65290
http://www.cedlas.econo.unlp.edu.ar/wp/wp-content/uploads/doc_cedlas207.pdf
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-65290
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Económicas
economic impact analysis
social cost benefit analysis
Uruguay
spellingShingle Ciencias Económicas
economic impact analysis
social cost benefit analysis
Uruguay
Banerjee, Onil
Cicowiez, Martín
Moreda, Adela
Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis
topic_facet Ciencias Económicas
economic impact analysis
social cost benefit analysis
Uruguay
description This paper makes two contributions to the debate on the compatibility of social cost benefit analysis and economic impact analysis. First we argue that benefits estimated through economic impact analysis are amenable to subsequent analysis in a social cost benefit framework when household utility is used as the measure of welfare. Second, economic impact analysis and social cost benefit analysis of investment loans may be evaluated from the perspective of the multilateral lender and from that of the beneficiary government. While the first is straightforward to implement, this paper develops an approach to evaluating the investment from the perspective of the beneficiary government which internalizes the repayment of the loan within the economic impact model itself. We compare these two perspectives by undertaking an economic impact and social cost benefit analysis of a US$6.25 million tourism investment in Uruguay.
format Articulo
Documento de trabajo
author Banerjee, Onil
Cicowiez, Martín
Moreda, Adela
author_facet Banerjee, Onil
Cicowiez, Martín
Moreda, Adela
author_sort Banerjee, Onil
title Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis
title_short Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis
title_full Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis
title_fullStr Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reconciliation Once and For All: Economic Impact Evaluation and Social Cost Benefit Analysis
title_sort reconciliation once and for all: economic impact evaluation and social cost benefit analysis
publishDate 2017
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/65290
http://www.cedlas.econo.unlp.edu.ar/wp/wp-content/uploads/doc_cedlas207.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT banerjeeonil reconciliationonceandforalleconomicimpactevaluationandsocialcostbenefitanalysis
AT cicowiezmartin reconciliationonceandforalleconomicimpactevaluationandsocialcostbenefitanalysis
AT moredaadela reconciliationonceandforalleconomicimpactevaluationandsocialcostbenefitanalysis
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820480444858369

Ejemplares similares