A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results

Human reasoning applies argumentation patterns to draw conclusions about a particular subject. These patterns represent the structure of the arguments in the form of argumentation schemes which are useful in AI to emulate human reasoning. A type of argument schema is that what allow to analyze the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David, Budán, Paola D., Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Ciencias Informáticas
inteligencia artificial
defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
patterns
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/31346
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-31346
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
inteligencia artificial
defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
patterns
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
inteligencia artificial
defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
patterns
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Budán, Paola D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
inteligencia artificial
defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
patterns
description Human reasoning applies argumentation patterns to draw conclusions about a particular subject. These patterns represent the structure of the arguments in the form of argumentation schemes which are useful in AI to emulate human reasoning. A type of argument schema is that what allow to analyze the similarities and diferences between two arguments, to find a solution to a new problem from an already known one. Researchers in the heavily studied field of analogies in discourse have recognized that there is not a full and complete definition to indicate when two arguments are considered analogous. Our proposal presents an initial attempt to formalize argumentation schemes based on analogies, considering a relationship of analogy between arguments. This will contribute to the area increasing such schemes usefulness in Artifícial Intelligence (AI), since it can be implemented later in Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP).
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Budán, Paola D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Budán, Paola D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_sort Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
title A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
title_short A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
title_full A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
title_fullStr A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
title_full_unstemmed A framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
title_sort framework for arguing from analogy: preliminary results
publishDate 2013
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/31346
work_keys_str_mv AT budanmaximilianocelmodavid aframeworkforarguingfromanalogypreliminaryresults
AT budanpaolad aframeworkforarguingfromanalogypreliminaryresults
AT simariguillermoricardo aframeworkforarguingfromanalogypreliminaryresults
AT budanmaximilianocelmodavid frameworkforarguingfromanalogypreliminaryresults
AT budanpaolad frameworkforarguingfromanalogypreliminaryresults
AT simariguillermoricardo frameworkforarguingfromanalogypreliminaryresults
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820471027597312

Ejemplares similares