A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion

The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special c...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budán, Paola D., Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David, Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2012
Materias:
Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-23615
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
Budán, Paola D.
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
Frameworks
Intelligent agents
Preliminary Study of Argumentation
Expert Opinion
description The research in argumentation has produce systems with a human-like mechanism for commonsense reasoning. One form of repre- senting arguments is called Argumentation Schemes, in which are argu- ment forms that represent inferential structures of arguments used in everyday discourse, and in special contexts like legal argumentation, sci- enti c argumentation, and especially in AI. One type of argumentation scheme corresponds to appeal to Expert Opinion or Position-to-Know argumentation. Position-to-know reasoning is typically used in an infor- mation seeking type of dialogue where one has to depend on a source. Most of such argumentation frameworks are based on Dung's seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In this work we introduce a novel framework, called Expert Argumentation Framework (EAF), extending AF with the capability of modeling the quality of expert associated with the arguments that proposed.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Budán, Paola D.
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet Budán, Paola D.
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_sort Budán, Paola D.
title A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_short A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_full A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_fullStr A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
title_sort preliminary study of argumentation frameworks and argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
publishDate 2012
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23615
work_keys_str_mv AT budanpaolad apreliminarystudyofargumentationframeworksandargumentationschemesthatappealtoexpertopinion
AT budanmaximilianocelmodavid apreliminarystudyofargumentationframeworksandargumentationschemesthatappealtoexpertopinion
AT simariguillermoricardo apreliminarystudyofargumentationframeworksandargumentationschemesthatappealtoexpertopinion
AT budanpaolad preliminarystudyofargumentationframeworksandargumentationschemesthatappealtoexpertopinion
AT budanmaximilianocelmodavid preliminarystudyofargumentationframeworksandargumentationschemesthatappealtoexpertopinion
AT simariguillermoricardo preliminarystudyofargumentationframeworksandargumentationschemesthatappealtoexpertopinion
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820466036375553

Ejemplares similares