Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP

The development of systems with the ability to reason about change notion and actions has been of great importance for the artificial intelligence community. The definition and implementation of systems capable of managing defeasible, incomplete, unreliable, or uncertain information has been also an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cobo, María Laura, Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23178
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-23178
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Informática
Temporal logic
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs
argumentative systems
knowledge representation
defeasible reasoning
commonsense reasoning
temporal reasoning
reasoning about change notion and actions
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
Informática
Temporal logic
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs
argumentative systems
knowledge representation
defeasible reasoning
commonsense reasoning
temporal reasoning
reasoning about change notion and actions
Cobo, María Laura
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
Informática
Temporal logic
Knowledge Representation Formalisms and Methods
Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs
argumentative systems
knowledge representation
defeasible reasoning
commonsense reasoning
temporal reasoning
reasoning about change notion and actions
description The development of systems with the ability to reason about change notion and actions has been of great importance for the artificial intelligence community. The definition and implementation of systems capable of managing defeasible, incomplete, unreliable, or uncertain information has been also an area of much interest. With a few exceptions research on these two ways of reasoning was independently pursued. Nevertheless, they are complementary and closely related, since many applications that deal with defeasible information also depends on the occurrence of events and time. DeLP is an argumentative system appropriate for commonsense reasoning. The defeasible argumentation basis of DeLP allows to build applications that deal with incomplete and contradictory information in dynamic domains. Thus, the resulting approach is suitable for representing agent’s knowledge and for providing an argumentation based reasoning mechanism for that agent (see for example [6, 1]). It is interesting to extend this system adding mechanisms to manage events and time as CDeLP [7]. Here we analyze how to develop a comparison criteria for arguments built up from causal information and considers commonsense rules of inertia.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Cobo, María Laura
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet Cobo, María Laura
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_sort Cobo, María Laura
title Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP
title_short Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP
title_full Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP
title_fullStr Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP
title_full_unstemmed Towards a comparison criteria for CDeLP
title_sort towards a comparison criteria for cdelp
publishDate 2007
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23178
work_keys_str_mv AT cobomarialaura towardsacomparisoncriteriaforcdelp
AT simariguillermoricardo towardsacomparisoncriteriaforcdelp
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820465744871424