Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems

In this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which two or more arguments are involved. In formal systems of defeasible argumentation, arguments for and against a proposition are produced and evaluated to verify the acceptability of that proposition....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez, Diego C., García, Alejandro Javier
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: 2001
Materias:
Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed Systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Abstract Argumentation Systems
Conflicts
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21632
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-21632
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Español
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed Systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Abstract Argumentation Systems
Conflicts
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed Systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Abstract Argumentation Systems
Conflicts
Martínez, Diego C.
García, Alejandro Javier
Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed Systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Abstract Argumentation Systems
Conflicts
description In this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which two or more arguments are involved. In formal systems of defeasible argumentation, arguments for and against a proposition are produced and evaluated to verify the acceptability of that proposition. The development of argumentation systems has grown in the last years [AG95, BV, Dung93, PRAK, Sim92, GS99] but no consensus has been reached yet on some issues, such as the representation of arguments, the way they interact, and the output of that interaction. Even then, the main idea in these systems is that any proposition will be accepted as true if there exists an argument that supports it, and this argument is acceptable according to an analysis between it and its counterarguments. Therefore, in the set of arguments of the system, some of them will be acceptable or justified arguments, while others not. Almost every system of this kind is based on the notion of binary conflicts between arguments. We consider here the existence of a more complex form of conflict, how to solve it, and the corresponding acceptability semantic.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Martínez, Diego C.
García, Alejandro Javier
author_facet Martínez, Diego C.
García, Alejandro Javier
author_sort Martínez, Diego C.
title Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
title_short Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
title_full Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
title_fullStr Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
title_full_unstemmed Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
title_sort conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
publishDate 2001
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21632
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezdiegoc conflictsinabstractargumentationsystems
AT garciaalejandrojavier conflictsinabstractargumentationsystems
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820464761307136

Ejemplares similares