Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents
The design of intelligent agents is greatly influenced by the many different models that exist to represent knowledge. It is essential that such agents have computationally adequate mechanisms to manage its knowledge, which more often than not is incomplete and/or inconsistent. It is also important...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Objeto de conferencia |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21439 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I19-R120-10915-21439 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
institution_str |
I-19 |
repository_str |
R-120 |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
language |
Inglés |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Prioritized Reasoning Intelligent agents |
spellingShingle |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Prioritized Reasoning Intelligent agents Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro Simari, Guillermo Ricardo Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
topic_facet |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Prioritized Reasoning Intelligent agents |
description |
The design of intelligent agents is greatly influenced by the many different models that exist to represent knowledge. It is essential that such agents have computationally adequate mechanisms to manage its knowledge, which more often than not is incomplete and/or inconsistent. It is also important for an agent to be able to obtain new conclusions that allow it to reason about the state of the world in which it is embedded.
It has been proven that this problem cannot be solved within the realm of Classic Logic.
This situation has triggered the development of a series of logical formalisms that extend the classic ones. These proposals often carry the names of Nonmonotonic Reasoning, or Defeasible Reasoning. Some examples of such models are McDermott and Doyle’s Nonmonotonic Logics, Reiter’s Default Logic, Moore’s Autoepistemic Logic, McCarthy’s Circumscription Model, and Belief Revision (also called Belief Change). This last formalism was introduced by G¨ardenfors and later extended by Alchourrón, G¨ardenfors, and Makinson [1, 4] |
format |
Objeto de conferencia Objeto de conferencia |
author |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_facet |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_sort |
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro |
title |
Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
title_short |
Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
title_full |
Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
title_fullStr |
Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
title_sort |
non prioritized reasoning in intelligent agents |
publishDate |
2003 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21439 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT falappamarceloalejandro nonprioritizedreasoninginintelligentagents AT simariguillermoricardo nonprioritizedreasoninginintelligentagents |
bdutipo_str |
Repositorios |
_version_ |
1764820464535863298 |