Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation

The Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dasso, Aristides, Funes, Ana, Peralta, Mario, Salgado, Carlos Humberto
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2005
Materias:
Ciencias Informáticas
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Metrics
Tools
Metrics Development
UML
Tools evaluation
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21123
Aporte de:
Aportado por : SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata .
id I19-R120-10915-21123
record_format dspace
spelling I19-R120-10915-211232019-01-30T04:02:54Z http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21123 isbn:950-665-337-2 Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation Dasso, Aristides Funes, Ana Peralta, Mario Salgado, Carlos Humberto 2005-05 2005 2012-09-18T15:27:04Z en Ciencias Informáticas SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Metrics Tools Metrics Development UML Tools evaluation The Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of changing or acquiring one. There are several ways to perform this evaluation from the simple rule-of-thumb to numeric or quantitative methods. We present an ongoing project that evaluates UML tools using the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) method. This method is very briefly presented and also some of the ongoing work in building a model directed to UML tool evaluation is explained. Eje: Ingeniería en Software Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) Objeto de conferencia Objeto de conferencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) application/pdf 286-290
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Metrics
Tools
Metrics Development
UML
Tools evaluation
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Metrics
Tools
Metrics Development
UML
Tools evaluation
Dasso, Aristides
Funes, Ana
Peralta, Mario
Salgado, Carlos Humberto
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Metrics
Tools
Metrics Development
UML
Tools evaluation
description The Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of changing or acquiring one. There are several ways to perform this evaluation from the simple rule-of-thumb to numeric or quantitative methods. We present an ongoing project that evaluates UML tools using the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) method. This method is very briefly presented and also some of the ongoing work in building a model directed to UML tool evaluation is explained.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Dasso, Aristides
Funes, Ana
Peralta, Mario
Salgado, Carlos Humberto
author_facet Dasso, Aristides
Funes, Ana
Peralta, Mario
Salgado, Carlos Humberto
author_sort Dasso, Aristides
title Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
title_short Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
title_full Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
title_fullStr Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
title_sort metrics development for uml tools evaluation
publishDate 2005
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21123
work_keys_str_mv AT dassoaristides metricsdevelopmentforumltoolsevaluation
AT funesana metricsdevelopmentforumltoolsevaluation
AT peraltamario metricsdevelopmentforumltoolsevaluation
AT salgadocarloshumberto metricsdevelopmentforumltoolsevaluation
_version_ 1734119374240874496

Ejemplares similares