A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms

It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Delladio, Telma, Rotstein, Nicolás D., Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Formato:	Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:	Inglés
Publicado:	2006
Materias:	Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents
Acceso en línea:	http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748
Aporte de:	SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata

id	I19-R120-10915-20748
record_format	dspace
institution	Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str	I-19
repository_str	R-120
collection	SEDICI (UNLP)
language	Inglés
topic	Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents
spellingShingle	Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents Delladio, Telma Rotstein, Nicolás D. Simari, Guillermo Ricardo A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
topic_facet	Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents
description	It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.
format	Objeto de conferencia Objeto de conferencia
author	Delladio, Telma Rotstein, Nicolás D. Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet	Delladio, Telma Rotstein, Nicolás D. Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_sort	Delladio, Telma
title	A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_short	A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_full	A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_fullStr	A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_full_unstemmed	A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_sort	comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
publishDate	2006
url	http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748
work_keys_str_mv	AT delladiotelma acomparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms AT rotsteinnicolasd acomparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms AT simariguillermoricardo acomparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms AT delladiotelma comparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms AT rotsteinnicolasd comparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms AT simariguillermoricardo comparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
bdutipo_str	Repositorios
_version_	1764820464828416003

A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms

Ejemplares similares