A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms

It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delladio, Telma, Rotstein, Nicolás D., Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2006
Materias:
Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-20748
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
Delladio, Telma
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
description It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Delladio, Telma
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_facet Delladio, Telma
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_sort Delladio, Telma
title A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_short A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_full A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_fullStr A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_sort comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
publishDate 2006
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748
work_keys_str_mv AT delladiotelma acomparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
AT rotsteinnicolasd acomparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
AT simariguillermoricardo acomparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
AT delladiotelma comparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
AT rotsteinnicolasd comparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
AT simariguillermoricardo comparisonbetweennonmonotonicformalisms
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820464828416003

Ejemplares similares