Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions

The increase in scientific production has generated a recurring problem on a global scale in the recommendation of reviewers for scientific journals and academic events, incentivizing the emergence of a significant diversity of automated solutions. This article presents a systematic review of these...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decoppet, Guillermo Omar, San Martín, Patricia Silvana
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/173746
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-173746
record_format dspace
spelling I19-R120-10915-1737462024-11-27T20:05:48Z http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/173746 Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions Mapeo sistemático de las soluciones automatizadas de recomendación de revisores Decoppet, Guillermo Omar San Martín, Patricia Silvana 2024-10 2024-11-27T14:22:41Z es Ciencias Informáticas Natural language processing Peer Review Recovery models Selection process Modelos de recuperación Procesamiento del lenguaje natural Proceso de selección Revisión por pares The increase in scientific production has generated a recurring problem on a global scale in the recommendation of reviewers for scientific journals and academic events, incentivizing the emergence of a significant diversity of automated solutions. This article presents a systematic review of these reviewer recommendation solutions published in scientific journals and academic events in the period 2018-2023. Methodologically, the final selection focused on the analysis of twenty-five articles. It covered the reviewer recommendation solutions' domain, methods, factors, and the data sets utilized. The results systematize the diverse types of proposed solutions allowing us to observe the similarities between the different methods, ft is estimated that the present mapping provides an original survey on this problem that provides well-founded comparative information to support future research on reviewer recommendations. El incremento de la producción científica ha generado una problemática recurrente a escala global en la recomendación de revisores de revistas científicas y eventos académicos, lo cual ha incentivado el surgimiento de una significativa diversidad de soluciones automatizadas. Este artículo presenta una revisión sistemática de dichas soluciones de recomendación de revisores publicadas en revistas científicas y eventos académicos en el período 2018-2023. En lo metodológico la selección final se enfocó en el análisis de veinticinco artículos. El mismo contempló el dominio de las soluciones de recomendación de revisores, sus métodos, factores y los conjuntos de datos utilizados. Los resultados sistematizan los tipos diversos de soluciones propuestas lo cual permitió observar las similitudes entre los diferentes métodos. Se estima que el presente mapeo aporta un relevamiento original sobre esta problemática que brinda información comparativa fundada para sustentar investigaciones futuras de recomendación de revisores. Facultad de Informática Articulo Articulo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf 168-181
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Español
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Natural language processing
Peer Review
Recovery models
Selection process
Modelos de recuperación
Procesamiento del lenguaje natural
Proceso de selección
Revisión por pares
spellingShingle Ciencias Informáticas
Natural language processing
Peer Review
Recovery models
Selection process
Modelos de recuperación
Procesamiento del lenguaje natural
Proceso de selección
Revisión por pares
Decoppet, Guillermo Omar
San Martín, Patricia Silvana
Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
topic_facet Ciencias Informáticas
Natural language processing
Peer Review
Recovery models
Selection process
Modelos de recuperación
Procesamiento del lenguaje natural
Proceso de selección
Revisión por pares
description The increase in scientific production has generated a recurring problem on a global scale in the recommendation of reviewers for scientific journals and academic events, incentivizing the emergence of a significant diversity of automated solutions. This article presents a systematic review of these reviewer recommendation solutions published in scientific journals and academic events in the period 2018-2023. Methodologically, the final selection focused on the analysis of twenty-five articles. It covered the reviewer recommendation solutions' domain, methods, factors, and the data sets utilized. The results systematize the diverse types of proposed solutions allowing us to observe the similarities between the different methods, ft is estimated that the present mapping provides an original survey on this problem that provides well-founded comparative information to support future research on reviewer recommendations.
format Articulo
Articulo
author Decoppet, Guillermo Omar
San Martín, Patricia Silvana
author_facet Decoppet, Guillermo Omar
San Martín, Patricia Silvana
author_sort Decoppet, Guillermo Omar
title Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
title_short Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
title_full Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
title_fullStr Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
title_full_unstemmed Systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
title_sort systematic mapping of automated reviewer recommendation solutions
publishDate 2024
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/173746
work_keys_str_mv AT decoppetguillermoomar systematicmappingofautomatedreviewerrecommendationsolutions
AT sanmartinpatriciasilvana systematicmappingofautomatedreviewerrecommendationsolutions
AT decoppetguillermoomar mapeosistematicodelassolucionesautomatizadasderecomendacionderevisores
AT sanmartinpatriciasilvana mapeosistematicodelassolucionesautomatizadasderecomendacionderevisores
_version_ 1833158004986347520