The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting

Reports affirm deficiencies in G20 governance evidencing under-representation of emerging economies in agenda-setting (Benson & Zürn 2019; Lei & Rui 2016; Prodi 2016). Underrepresentation is measured under the logic of an agenda that maximizes economic solutions based on the interests of de...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Freites Hernández, Astrid
Formato: Objeto de conferencia
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Relaciones Internacionales
G20
Institutionalization
Agenda-Setting
International Regimes
Global Governance
Agenda-setting
Regimes Internacionais
Governança Global
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/168446
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-168446
record_format dspace
spelling I19-R120-10915-1684462024-08-09T20:09:03Z http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/168446 The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting O papel da institucionalização na representação da definição da agenda do G20 Freites Hernández, Astrid 2022-11 2022 2024-08-09T16:03:10Z en Relaciones Internacionales G20 Institutionalization Agenda-Setting International Regimes Global Governance Agenda-setting Regimes Internacionais Governança Global Reports affirm deficiencies in G20 governance evidencing under-representation of emerging economies in agenda-setting (Benson & Zürn 2019; Lei & Rui 2016; Prodi 2016). Underrepresentation is measured under the logic of an agenda that maximizes economic solutions based on the interests of developed countries. This has implications for emerging countries given that not all can achieve such maximization without first reducing economic vulnerabilities such as unemployment and social unprotection. This study explores the conditions that produce imbalance in the representation of G20 states' interests in their agenda-setting according to Krasner's (1999) theoretical approach. It argues that although the G20 has been institutionalizing its behavior over the last twelve years, it is still in the middle ground, leaving room for more developed nations with greater experience in international negotiations to set the agenda. Applying a qualitative methodology based on a sequential strategy of two data collection and analysis techniques, the results increase the understanding of how the level of institutionalization interacts with international policies. In the case of the G20, it is corroborated that on the road to greater institutionalization, emerging nations assume less prominence in agenda setting. Relatórios afirmam deficiências na governança do G20 mostrando sub-representação das economias emergentes na agenda-setting (Benson & Zürn 2019; Lei & Rui 2016; Prodi 2016). A sub-representação é medida sob a lógica de uma agenda que maximiza as soluções econômicas a partir dos interesses dos países desenvolvidos. Isso tem implicações para os países emergentes, uma vez que nem todos podem atingir essa maximização sem primeiro reduzir as vulnerabilidades econômicas, como o desemprego e a vulnerabilidade social. Este estudo explora as condições que produzem um desequilíbrio na representação dos interesses dos estados do G20 em sua agenda-setting de acordo com a abordagem teórica de Krasner (1999). Argumenta que, embora o G20 tenha institucionalizado seu comportamento nos últimos doze anos, ele ainda está na metade do caminho, deixando espaço para nações mais desenvolvidas e com maior experiência em negociações internacionais darem o tom da agenda. Aplicando uma metodologia qualitativa baseada em uma estratégia sequencial de duas técnicas de coleta e análise de dados, os resultados aumentam a compreensão de como o nível de institucionalização interage com as políticas internacionais. No caso do G20, corrobora-se que no caminho de uma maior institucionalização, as nações emergentes assumem menos destaque na agenda-setting. Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales Objeto de conferencia Objeto de conferencia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) application/pdf
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Relaciones Internacionales
G20
Institutionalization
Agenda-Setting
International Regimes
Global Governance
Agenda-setting
Regimes Internacionais
Governança Global
spellingShingle Relaciones Internacionales
G20
Institutionalization
Agenda-Setting
International Regimes
Global Governance
Agenda-setting
Regimes Internacionais
Governança Global
Freites Hernández, Astrid
The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting
topic_facet Relaciones Internacionales
G20
Institutionalization
Agenda-Setting
International Regimes
Global Governance
Agenda-setting
Regimes Internacionais
Governança Global
description Reports affirm deficiencies in G20 governance evidencing under-representation of emerging economies in agenda-setting (Benson & Zürn 2019; Lei & Rui 2016; Prodi 2016). Underrepresentation is measured under the logic of an agenda that maximizes economic solutions based on the interests of developed countries. This has implications for emerging countries given that not all can achieve such maximization without first reducing economic vulnerabilities such as unemployment and social unprotection. This study explores the conditions that produce imbalance in the representation of G20 states' interests in their agenda-setting according to Krasner's (1999) theoretical approach. It argues that although the G20 has been institutionalizing its behavior over the last twelve years, it is still in the middle ground, leaving room for more developed nations with greater experience in international negotiations to set the agenda. Applying a qualitative methodology based on a sequential strategy of two data collection and analysis techniques, the results increase the understanding of how the level of institutionalization interacts with international policies. In the case of the G20, it is corroborated that on the road to greater institutionalization, emerging nations assume less prominence in agenda setting.
format Objeto de conferencia
Objeto de conferencia
author Freites Hernández, Astrid
author_facet Freites Hernández, Astrid
author_sort Freites Hernández, Astrid
title The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting
title_short The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting
title_full The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting
title_fullStr The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting
title_full_unstemmed The role of institutionalization in the representation of G20 agenda-setting
title_sort role of institutionalization in the representation of g20 agenda-setting
publishDate 2022
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/168446
work_keys_str_mv AT freiteshernandezastrid theroleofinstitutionalizationintherepresentationofg20agendasetting
AT freiteshernandezastrid opapeldainstitucionalizacaonarepresentacaodadefinicaodaagendadog20
AT freiteshernandezastrid roleofinstitutionalizationintherepresentationofg20agendasetting
_version_ 1807223700648361984

Ejemplares similares