Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee

In the present work, the potential beneft of using multi-cumulative trapping headspace extraction was explored by comparing the results using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coated with divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane and a probe-like tool coated with polydimethylsiloxane. The efcien...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eggermont, Damien, Spadafora, Natasha Damiana, Aspromonte, Juan Antonio, Pellegrino Vidal, Rocío, Purcaro, Giorgia
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Ciencias Exactas
High capacity (HC)
HiSorb
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)
Multi-cumulative trapping (MCT)
Multidimensional comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC)
Coffee
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/160314
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-160314
record_format dspace
spelling I19-R120-10915-1603142023-11-17T20:06:53Z http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/160314 Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee Eggermont, Damien Spadafora, Natasha Damiana Aspromonte, Juan Antonio Pellegrino Vidal, Rocío Purcaro, Giorgia 2023-04-12 2023-11-17T18:42:06Z en Ciencias Exactas High capacity (HC) HiSorb Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) Multi-cumulative trapping (MCT) Multidimensional comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC) Coffee In the present work, the potential beneft of using multi-cumulative trapping headspace extraction was explored by comparing the results using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coated with divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane and a probe-like tool coated with polydimethylsiloxane. The efciency of a single 30-min extraction, already explored in previous work, was compared with that of multiple shorter extractions. We evaluated three diferent conditions, i.e., three repeated extractions for 10 min each from diferent sample vials (for both the probe-like tool and SPME) or from the same vial (for SPME) containing brewed cofee. The entire study was performed using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The two-dimensional plots were aligned and integrated using a tile-sum approach before any statistical analysis. A detailed comparison of all the tested conditions was performed on a set of 25 targeted compounds. Although a single 30-min extraction using the probe-like tool provided a signifcantly higher compound intensity than SPME single extraction, the use of multiple shorter extractions with SPME showed similar results. However, multiple extractions with the probe-like tool showed a greater increase in the number of extracted compounds. Furthermore, an untargeted crosssample comparison was performed to evaluate the ability of the two tested tools and the diferent extraction procedures in diferentiating between espresso-brewed cofee samples obtained from capsules made of diferent packaging materials (i.e., compostable capsules, aluminum capsules, aluminum multilayer pack). The highest explained variance was obtained using the probe-like tool and multiple extractions (91.6% compared to 83.9% of the single extraction); nevertheless, SPME multiple extractions showed similar results with 88.3% of variance explained. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Métodos Analíticos Articulo Articulo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) application/pdf 4501-4510
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Exactas
High capacity (HC)
HiSorb
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)
Multi-cumulative trapping (MCT)
Multidimensional comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC)
Coffee
spellingShingle Ciencias Exactas
High capacity (HC)
HiSorb
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)
Multi-cumulative trapping (MCT)
Multidimensional comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC)
Coffee
Eggermont, Damien
Spadafora, Natasha Damiana
Aspromonte, Juan Antonio
Pellegrino Vidal, Rocío
Purcaro, Giorgia
Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
topic_facet Ciencias Exactas
High capacity (HC)
HiSorb
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME)
Multi-cumulative trapping (MCT)
Multidimensional comprehensive gas chromatography (GC × GC)
Coffee
description In the present work, the potential beneft of using multi-cumulative trapping headspace extraction was explored by comparing the results using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coated with divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane and a probe-like tool coated with polydimethylsiloxane. The efciency of a single 30-min extraction, already explored in previous work, was compared with that of multiple shorter extractions. We evaluated three diferent conditions, i.e., three repeated extractions for 10 min each from diferent sample vials (for both the probe-like tool and SPME) or from the same vial (for SPME) containing brewed cofee. The entire study was performed using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. The two-dimensional plots were aligned and integrated using a tile-sum approach before any statistical analysis. A detailed comparison of all the tested conditions was performed on a set of 25 targeted compounds. Although a single 30-min extraction using the probe-like tool provided a signifcantly higher compound intensity than SPME single extraction, the use of multiple shorter extractions with SPME showed similar results. However, multiple extractions with the probe-like tool showed a greater increase in the number of extracted compounds. Furthermore, an untargeted crosssample comparison was performed to evaluate the ability of the two tested tools and the diferent extraction procedures in diferentiating between espresso-brewed cofee samples obtained from capsules made of diferent packaging materials (i.e., compostable capsules, aluminum capsules, aluminum multilayer pack). The highest explained variance was obtained using the probe-like tool and multiple extractions (91.6% compared to 83.9% of the single extraction); nevertheless, SPME multiple extractions showed similar results with 88.3% of variance explained.
format Articulo
Articulo
author Eggermont, Damien
Spadafora, Natasha Damiana
Aspromonte, Juan Antonio
Pellegrino Vidal, Rocío
Purcaro, Giorgia
author_facet Eggermont, Damien
Spadafora, Natasha Damiana
Aspromonte, Juan Antonio
Pellegrino Vidal, Rocío
Purcaro, Giorgia
author_sort Eggermont, Damien
title Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
title_short Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
title_full Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
title_fullStr Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
title_full_unstemmed Exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
title_sort exploring different high-capacity tools and extraction modes to characterize the aroma of brewed coffee
publishDate 2023
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/160314
work_keys_str_mv AT eggermontdamien exploringdifferenthighcapacitytoolsandextractionmodestocharacterizethearomaofbrewedcoffee
AT spadaforanatashadamiana exploringdifferenthighcapacitytoolsandextractionmodestocharacterizethearomaofbrewedcoffee
AT aspromontejuanantonio exploringdifferenthighcapacitytoolsandextractionmodestocharacterizethearomaofbrewedcoffee
AT pellegrinovidalrocio exploringdifferenthighcapacitytoolsandextractionmodestocharacterizethearomaofbrewedcoffee
AT purcarogiorgia exploringdifferenthighcapacitytoolsandextractionmodestocharacterizethearomaofbrewedcoffee
_version_ 1807221884551430144

Ejemplares similares