The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

In this paper, I discuss the current thesis on the modern origin of the <i>ad hominem</i>-argument, by analysing the Aristotelian conception of it. In view of the recent accounts which consider it a relative argument, i.e., acceptable only by the particular respondent, I maintain that th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chichi, Graciela Marta
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2002
Materias:
Filosofía
argumentum ad hominem
argumentum ad personam
Aristotle
dialectics
Schopenhauer
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/131852
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-131852
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Filosofía
argumentum ad hominem
argumentum ad personam
Aristotle
dialectics
Schopenhauer
spellingShingle Filosofía
argumentum ad hominem
argumentum ad personam
Aristotle
dialectics
Schopenhauer
Chichi, Graciela Marta
The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
topic_facet Filosofía
argumentum ad hominem
argumentum ad personam
Aristotle
dialectics
Schopenhauer
description In this paper, I discuss the current thesis on the modern origin of the <i>ad hominem</i>-argument, by analysing the Aristotelian conception of it. In view of the recent accounts which consider it a relative argument, i.e., acceptable only by the particular respondent, I maintain that there are two Aristotelian versions of the <i>ad hominem</i>, that have identifiable characteristics, and both correspond to the standard variants distinguished in the contemporary treatments of the famous informal fallacy: the abusive and the circumstancial or <i>tu quoque</i> types. I propose to reconstruct the two Aristotelian versions (see sections 1 and 2), which have been recognized again in the ninteenth century (sec. 3). Finally, I examine whether or not it was considered as a fallacious dialogue device by Aristotle and by A. Schopenhauer (sec. 4).
format Articulo
Articulo
author Chichi, Graciela Marta
author_facet Chichi, Graciela Marta
author_sort Chichi, Graciela Marta
title The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
title_short The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
title_full The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
title_fullStr The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
title_full_unstemmed The Greek Roots of the Ad Hominem-Argument
title_sort greek roots of the ad hominem-argument
publishDate 2002
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/131852
work_keys_str_mv AT chichigracielamarta thegreekrootsoftheadhominemargument
AT chichigracielamarta greekrootsoftheadhominemargument
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820453481775104

Ejemplares similares