Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

By reviewing the articles published in the American Journal of Sociology between 1915 and 1930, this article explores the uses of terminological expressions characteristic of the qualitative approach supposedly developed by the Chicago school: case study, fieldwork, natural history, etc. First we pr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piovani, Juan Ignacio, Rausky, María Eugenia, Santos, Javier Alberto
Formato: Articulo Preprint
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Sociología
Chicago School
Qualitative methods
American Journal of Sociology
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/120405
Aporte de:
SEDICI (UNLP) de Universidad Nacional de La Plata
id I19-R120-10915-120405
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Sociología
Chicago School
Qualitative methods
American Journal of Sociology
spellingShingle Sociología
Chicago School
Qualitative methods
American Journal of Sociology
Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Rausky, María Eugenia
Santos, Javier Alberto
Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School
topic_facet Sociología
Chicago School
Qualitative methods
American Journal of Sociology
description By reviewing the articles published in the American Journal of Sociology between 1915 and 1930, this article explores the uses of terminological expressions characteristic of the qualitative approach supposedly developed by the Chicago school: case study, fieldwork, natural history, etc. First we present the intellectual and institutional aspects of the school. Then we examine a corpus of articles and reviews taking into account: the importance of the methodological reflection, the relation between the methods of the natural sciences and the social sciences, as well as the qualitative-quantitative antagonism. The main conclusion is that even if such expressions – as used in the corpus – cannot be regarded as qualitative in the current sense, particularly due to their epistemological foundations, we can observe a growing recognition of the important role of non-statistical methods in the social sciences, mainly among Chicagoans.
format Articulo
Preprint
author Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Rausky, María Eugenia
Santos, Javier Alberto
author_facet Piovani, Juan Ignacio
Rausky, María Eugenia
Santos, Javier Alberto
author_sort Piovani, Juan Ignacio
title Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School
title_short Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School
title_full Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School
title_fullStr Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Research in issues of the American Journal of Sociology during the Hegemony of the Chicago School
title_sort qualitative research in issues of the american journal of sociology during the hegemony of the chicago school
publishDate 2015
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/120405
work_keys_str_mv AT piovanijuanignacio qualitativeresearchinissuesoftheamericanjournalofsociologyduringthehegemonyofthechicagoschool
AT rauskymariaeugenia qualitativeresearchinissuesoftheamericanjournalofsociologyduringthehegemonyofthechicagoschool
AT santosjavieralberto qualitativeresearchinissuesoftheamericanjournalofsociologyduringthehegemonyofthechicagoschool
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820449861042177

Ejemplares similares