Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects

Background: High-pass and low-pass fi lters applied to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECG) are fundamental to avoid artifacts, but an inappropriate use may lead to misdiagnosis. Our goal is to evaluate cutoff points for these fi lters used as routine by cardiology professionals from different countries...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parola, Franco, García Niebla, Javier
Formato: Articulo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/118090
Aporte de:
id I19-R120-10915-118090
record_format dspace
institution Universidad Nacional de La Plata
institution_str I-19
repository_str R-120
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
language Inglés
topic Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
spellingShingle Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
Parola, Franco
García Niebla, Javier
Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
topic_facet Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
description Background: High-pass and low-pass fi lters applied to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECG) are fundamental to avoid artifacts, but an inappropriate use may lead to misdiagnosis. Our goal is to evaluate cutoff points for these fi lters used as routine by cardiology professionals from different countries, and to determine to what extent they adjust to the established guidelines. Methods: We designed a descriptive study where 12-lead ECGs were included, both from adults and teenagers, distributed between August 2016 and February 2017 within the Ibero-American Forum on Arrhythmias on the Internet (FIAI) through the instant messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram. Results: 48% of ECGs had at least one of the two fi lter cutoff points printed. The bandwidth recommended by different scientifi c societies (≤ 0.05 Hz and ≥ 150 Hz) was present in 2%. The most frequent low frequency cutoff value was 0.5 Hz (47%) and the high frequency one was between 25 Hz and 40 Hz (74%). As to the last consensus guidelines, we registered that 32% of ECGs met the low frequency cutoff point and just 5% the high frequency cutoff point. Conclusions: There is a high ratio of tracings lacking printed information on the fi lter used, and those that do have it, use inappropriate cutoff points in a high percentage, which may have significant diagnostic consequences.
format Articulo
Articulo
author Parola, Franco
García Niebla, Javier
author_facet Parola, Franco
García Niebla, Javier
author_sort Parola, Franco
title Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_short Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_full Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_fullStr Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_full_unstemmed Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_sort use of high-pass and low-pass electrocardiographic filters in an international cardiological community and possible clinical effects
publishDate 2017
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/118090
work_keys_str_mv AT parolafranco useofhighpassandlowpasselectrocardiographicfiltersinaninternationalcardiologicalcommunityandpossibleclinicaleffects
AT garcianieblajavier useofhighpassandlowpasselectrocardiographicfiltersinaninternationalcardiologicalcommunityandpossibleclinicaleffects
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820447443025923