Quality of democracy in Venezuela

Discussions of democracy in contemporary Venezuela lack a settled definition of the subject, how to study it, or indeed of what counts as «democracy» in the first place. The regime has been described as everything from participatory democracy, hybrid, mixed, and personalist to populist, illiberal, o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEVINE, Daniel H.; University of Michigan, MOLINA V., José Enrique; Universidad del Zulia
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad de Salamanca 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/9349
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=es/es-011&d=article9349oai
Aporte de:
id I16-R122-article9349oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic Venezuela; quality of democracy; scenarios; Chávez; authoritarianism
Venezuela; calidad de la democracia; escenarios; Chávez; autoritarismo
spellingShingle Venezuela; quality of democracy; scenarios; Chávez; authoritarianism
Venezuela; calidad de la democracia; escenarios; Chávez; autoritarismo
LEVINE, Daniel H.; University of Michigan
MOLINA V., José Enrique; Universidad del Zulia
Quality of democracy in Venezuela
topic_facet Venezuela; quality of democracy; scenarios; Chávez; authoritarianism
Venezuela; calidad de la democracia; escenarios; Chávez; autoritarismo
description Discussions of democracy in contemporary Venezuela lack a settled definition of the subject, how to study it, or indeed of what counts as «democracy» in the first place. The regime has been described as everything from participatory democracy, hybrid, mixed, and personalist to populist, illiberal, or no longer democratic but rather competitive authoritarian. The goal of this article is to measure the quality of democracy in Venezuela, within the terms of a procedural concept of democracy as detailed in our earlier work. Empirical measurement of the quality of democracy on five dimensions (electoral choice, participation, responsiveness, accountability, sovereignty) reveals a low level overall and deep institutional weakness under a personalist leadership, with little change from 2005 to 2010. Future scenarios, after the 2012 presidential election result, include reinforcement of authoritarian trends, open militarization, liberalization and institutional strengthening, or long term volatility and polarized conflict. All scenarios are contingent on the health of President Chávez, who is a central unifying factor for his movement and regime
format Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículo
publishedVersion
author LEVINE, Daniel H.; University of Michigan
MOLINA V., José Enrique; Universidad del Zulia
author_facet LEVINE, Daniel H.; University of Michigan
MOLINA V., José Enrique; Universidad del Zulia
author_sort LEVINE, Daniel H.; University of Michigan
title Quality of democracy in Venezuela
title_short Quality of democracy in Venezuela
title_full Quality of democracy in Venezuela
title_fullStr Quality of democracy in Venezuela
title_full_unstemmed Quality of democracy in Venezuela
title_sort quality of democracy in venezuela
publisher Universidad de Salamanca
publishDate 2013
url http://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-2887/article/view/9349
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=es/es-011&d=article9349oai
work_keys_str_mv AT levinedanielhuniversityofmichigan qualityofdemocracyinvenezuela
AT molinavjoseenriqueuniversidaddelzulia qualityofdemocracyinvenezuela
AT levinedanielhuniversityofmichigan calidaddelademocraciaenvenezuela
AT molinavjoseenriqueuniversidaddelzulia calidaddelademocraciaenvenezuela
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820439999184898