Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman

The aim of this paper is to discuss two normative versions of Social Epistemology (SE), whose initial approaches raised 25 years ago gave place to a new tradition. Revisiting the origin of each account one can find that their interest in normativity, despite their differences, tries to draw the atte...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: G. Orozco, Melissa; Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro
Formato: Artículo revisado por pares
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/44054
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article44054oai
Aporte de:
id I16-R122-article44054oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic Normativity, Analytical Social Epistemology, social epistemology, social studies of science, knowledge production, descriptive studies.
Normatividad, Epistemología Social Analítica, Epistemología Social, estudios sociales de la ciencia, producción del conocimiento, estudios descriptivos.
spellingShingle Normativity, Analytical Social Epistemology, social epistemology, social studies of science, knowledge production, descriptive studies.
Normatividad, Epistemología Social Analítica, Epistemología Social, estudios sociales de la ciencia, producción del conocimiento, estudios descriptivos.
G. Orozco, Melissa; Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro
Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman
topic_facet Normativity, Analytical Social Epistemology, social epistemology, social studies of science, knowledge production, descriptive studies.
Normatividad, Epistemología Social Analítica, Epistemología Social, estudios sociales de la ciencia, producción del conocimiento, estudios descriptivos.
description The aim of this paper is to discuss two normative versions of Social Epistemology (SE), whose initial approaches raised 25 years ago gave place to a new tradition. Revisiting the origin of each account one can find that their interest in normativity, despite their differences, tries to draw the attention of philosophical and social studies of science with the aim of analyzing their connections and provide them with a frame to take in their own inquiries of knowledge production the classical missions of epistemology. Yet, SE as a broader interdisciplinary project raises the question of the role of epistemology in our time. The paper is divided in three parts. In the first, we give an account of the emergence of these visions, after that, we review each one of them in more detail and, finally, we end up with a brief comment.
format Artículo revisado por pares
Artículo revisado por pares
author G. Orozco, Melissa; Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro
author_facet G. Orozco, Melissa; Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro
author_sort G. Orozco, Melissa; Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro
title Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman
title_short Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman
title_full Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman
title_fullStr Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman
title_full_unstemmed Normative Social Epistemology: Fuller vs. Goldman
title_sort normative social epistemology: fuller vs. goldman
publisher Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM
publishDate 2014
url http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/44054
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article44054oai
work_keys_str_mv AT gorozcomelissauniversidadautonomadequeretaro normativesocialepistemologyfullervsgoldman
AT gorozcomelissauniversidadautonomadequeretaro epistemologiasocialnormativafullervsgoldman
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820437375647746