The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences

The purpose of this text is to present a collective review –in comparative terms– of a certain number of authors who have recently dealt with the epistemological nature of the social sciences. They are authors that belong, on the one hand, to the Anglo school of thought –most of them philosophers wh...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Giménez Montiel, Gilberto
Formato: Artículo revisado por pares
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/33113
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article33113oai
Aporte de:
id I16-R122-article33113oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic Epistemology, philosophy of science, causal mechanisms, research programs, explanatory schemes, methodological individualism.
Epistemología, filosofía de la ciencia, mecanismos causales, programas de investigación, esquemas explicativos, individualismo metodológico.
spellingShingle Epistemology, philosophy of science, causal mechanisms, research programs, explanatory schemes, methodological individualism.
Epistemología, filosofía de la ciencia, mecanismos causales, programas de investigación, esquemas explicativos, individualismo metodológico.
Giménez Montiel, Gilberto
The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
topic_facet Epistemology, philosophy of science, causal mechanisms, research programs, explanatory schemes, methodological individualism.
Epistemología, filosofía de la ciencia, mecanismos causales, programas de investigación, esquemas explicativos, individualismo metodológico.
description The purpose of this text is to present a collective review –in comparative terms– of a certain number of authors who have recently dealt with the epistemological nature of the social sciences. They are authors that belong, on the one hand, to the Anglo school of thought –most of them philosophers who cultivate the so-called philosophy of science– and, on the other hand, authors of the French tradition –sociologists who have developed the epistemology of the social sciences following the tradition of Canguilhem and Bachelard–. The external, normative and naturalistic epistemology of the new English speaking philosophers of the social sciences is compared with that of the internal, descriptive and analytical epistemology of the French school, highlighting their similarities and differences.
format Artículo revisado por pares
Artículo revisado por pares
author Giménez Montiel, Gilberto
author_facet Giménez Montiel, Gilberto
author_sort Giménez Montiel, Gilberto
title The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
title_short The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
title_full The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
title_fullStr The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
title_full_unstemmed The current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
title_sort current controversy over the scientific nature of the social sciences
publisher Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, UNAM
publishDate 2012
url http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/33113
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-047&d=article33113oai
work_keys_str_mv AT gimenezmontielgilberto thecurrentcontroversyoverthescientificnatureofthesocialsciences
AT gimenezmontielgilberto lacontroversiaactualsobreelestatutocientificodelascienciassociales
AT gimenezmontielgilberto currentcontroversyoverthescientificnatureofthesocialsciences
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820435251232770