Technoscience, irony and care

This paper has three sections. Firstly, I explore what the term technoscience does mean. I justify the relevance of the term on both a) the empirical evidence that social studies of science bring up, and b) the philosophical redescription that Heidegger offers on the relationship between science and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rueda Barrera, Eduardo A.
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/Kawsaypacha/article/view/21776
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pe/pe-013&d=article21776oai
Aporte de:
id I16-R122-article21776oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic Tecnociencia
Ironía
Cuidado
Ideal de no violencia
Responsabilidad por los otros
Resurrección de la naturaleza
spellingShingle Tecnociencia
Ironía
Cuidado
Ideal de no violencia
Responsabilidad por los otros
Resurrección de la naturaleza
Rueda Barrera, Eduardo A.
Technoscience, irony and care
topic_facet Tecnociencia
Ironía
Cuidado
Ideal de no violencia
Responsabilidad por los otros
Resurrección de la naturaleza
description This paper has three sections. Firstly, I explore what the term technoscience does mean. I justify the relevance of the term on both a) the empirical evidence that social studies of science bring up, and b) the philosophical redescription that Heidegger offers on the relationship between science and technique. Secondly, I show up the irony that emerge when we consider technoscience as [the] «factor of modernity». This irony arises, according to Gianni Vattimo, from «the transformation of the world in a place in where there are not facts anymore but interpretations. From this circumstance follows the transformation of the potential for domination of technoscience, which has occupied the critical work of the Frankfurters, into the normative ideal of reducing violence. Finally, I show how this ideal should be understood: the ideal of reducing violence must be understood as care. Following Agnes Heller, I explain how care, to be real, implies a double moral duty: responsibility before others and resurrection of nature. I insist that both the responsibility to others and the resurrection of nature can only be genuine if the Others and the Other (nature) constitute not an xteeriority, but a pta rof who we are.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Rueda Barrera, Eduardo A.
author_facet Rueda Barrera, Eduardo A.
author_sort Rueda Barrera, Eduardo A.
title Technoscience, irony and care
title_short Technoscience, irony and care
title_full Technoscience, irony and care
title_fullStr Technoscience, irony and care
title_full_unstemmed Technoscience, irony and care
title_sort technoscience, irony and care
publisher Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publishDate 2020
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/Kawsaypacha/article/view/21776
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pe/pe-013&d=article21776oai
work_keys_str_mv AT ruedabarreraeduardoa technoscienceironyandcare
AT ruedabarreraeduardoa tecnocienciaironiaycuidado
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820433903812610