Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics

In this paper, we consider the two main causation mechanisms characterizing Marxian theory: the one running from productive forces to relations of production (Marx I) and the other moving in the opposite direction (Marx II). We argue that Marx did not achieve a satisfactory integration of the two me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pagano, Ugo; Universidad de Siena
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad del Pacífico 2014
Materias:
New Institutional Economics, organizational equilibria, institutional complementaries, Marxian Theory, Marxism, Marx
nueva economía institucional, neo-institucionalismo, economía, marxismo, Marx
Acceso en línea:http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/194
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pe/pe-014&d=article194oai
Aporte de:
Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO) de Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
id I16-R122-article194oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic New Institutional Economics, organizational equilibria, institutional complementaries, Marxian Theory, Marxism, Marx
nueva economía institucional, neo-institucionalismo, economía, marxismo, Marx
spellingShingle New Institutional Economics, organizational equilibria, institutional complementaries, Marxian Theory, Marxism, Marx
nueva economía institucional, neo-institucionalismo, economía, marxismo, Marx
Pagano, Ugo; Universidad de Siena
Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
topic_facet New Institutional Economics, organizational equilibria, institutional complementaries, Marxian Theory, Marxism, Marx
nueva economía institucional, neo-institucionalismo, economía, marxismo, Marx
description In this paper, we consider the two main causation mechanisms characterizing Marxian theory: the one running from productive forces to relations of production (Marx I) and the other moving in the opposite direction (Marx II). We argue that Marx did not achieve a satisfactory integration of the two mechanisms and that he failed to point out how multiple technological institutionalpaths may stem from the cumulative interactions between relations of production and productive forces. In spite of many important analytical insights, NIE has exacerbated the primacy of technology and productive forces, which characterized «Marx I». After NIE, the analysis of thecomplex relations between «Marx I» and «Marx II» can still help to extend the scope of institutional theory and, in particular, its application to the comparative analysis of models of capitalism coexisting in the global economy.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículo
publishedVersion
author Pagano, Ugo; Universidad de Siena
author_facet Pagano, Ugo; Universidad de Siena
author_sort Pagano, Ugo; Universidad de Siena
title Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
title_short Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
title_full Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
title_fullStr Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
title_full_unstemmed Karl Marx after New Institutional Economics
title_sort karl marx after new institutional economics
publisher Universidad del Pacífico
publishDate 2014
url http://revistas.up.edu.pe/index.php/apuntes/article/view/194
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=pe/pe-014&d=article194oai
work_keys_str_mv AT paganougouniversidaddesiena karlmarxafternewinstitutionaleconomics
AT paganougouniversidaddesiena karlmarxluegodelanuevaeconomiainstitucional
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820434992234497

Ejemplares similares