CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

In his latest book, Crítica y Sabotaje, Manuel Asensi presents a new method of criticism of the artistic discourse — «criticism as sabotage». Helped by a distrustful stance towards the work of art, and by the use of his own terminology, this criticism aims either to uncover (and to sabotage) the way...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Arranz Muñoz, Juan
Formato: Artículo publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2016
Materias:
sabotaje; deconstrucción; Asensi; teoría literaria; crítica
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/12411
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=ar/ar-001&d=article12411oai
Aporte de:
Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO) de Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
id I16-R122-article12411oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
language Español
topic sabotaje; deconstrucción; Asensi; teoría literaria; crítica
spellingShingle sabotaje; deconstrucción; Asensi; teoría literaria; crítica
Arranz Muñoz, Juan
CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION
topic_facet sabotaje; deconstrucción; Asensi; teoría literaria; crítica
description In his latest book, Crítica y Sabotaje, Manuel Asensi presents a new method of criticism of the artistic discourse — «criticism as sabotage». Helped by a distrustful stance towards the work of art, and by the use of his own terminology, this criticism aims either to uncover (and to sabotage) the way in which the discourses try to impose a certain image of the world to the receiver (thus obtaining from him a certain behavior), or to explain the way in which some particular discourses present themselves as ambiguous and controversial (sabotaging its own affirmative nature, as well as the social system to which they belong).            In this paper, through an attentive reading of Asensi's interpretative proposals, we try to trace the roots that this type of criticism has in the deconstructionist literary theory, with the goal to link Asensi’s work with the ideas and strategies developed by his predecessors Jacques Derrida and Paul de Man. This analysis will, in the end, allow us to identify the deconstruction as the major influence of the critical sabotage, but also to enumerate the discrepancies that separate both criticisms.
format Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
Artículo
publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
author Arranz Muñoz, Juan
author_facet Arranz Muñoz, Juan
author_sort Arranz Muñoz, Juan
title CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION
title_short CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION
title_full CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION
title_fullStr CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION
title_full_unstemmed CRITICISM AS SABOTAGE AND THE STRATEGIES OF DECONSTRUCTION
title_sort criticism as sabotage and the strategies of deconstruction
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2016
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/12411
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=ar/ar-001&d=article12411oai
work_keys_str_mv AT arranzmunozjuan criticismassabotageandthestrategiesofdeconstruction
AT arranzmunozjuan elsabotajecriticoylasestrategiasdeladeconstruccion
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820432746184707

Ejemplares similares