Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries

This chapter summarises and compares the findings of the studies of five major emigration countries – India, Mexico, Morocco, the Philippines and Turkey – presented in this issue. It discusses the extent to which the five countries share significant common characteristics, so that a comparative anal...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stephen Castles
Formato: Artículo científico
Publicado: Red Internacional de Migración y Desarrollo 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=66000707
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-037&d=66000707oai
Aporte de:
id I16-R122-66000707oai
record_format dspace
institution Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
institution_str I-16
repository_str R-122
collection Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
topic Relaciones Internacionales
Migration
development
social transformation
remittances
diasporas
return
spellingShingle Relaciones Internacionales
Migration
development
social transformation
remittances
diasporas
return
Stephen Castles
Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
topic_facet Relaciones Internacionales
Migration
development
social transformation
remittances
diasporas
return
description This chapter summarises and compares the findings of the studies of five major emigration countries – India, Mexico, Morocco, the Philippines and Turkey – presented in this issue. It discusses the extent to which the five countries share significant common characteristics, so that a comparative analysis may provide useful insights into migratory processes. The chapter takes up the debate on migration and development that has become so prominent in international policy circles. An attempt is made to examine the extent to which migration has actually contributed to development in the five countries of origin. The general conclusion is that migration is itself a result of processes of social transformation linked to globalisation and the post–colonial re–ordering of economic and political relationships. In turn, migration becomes a factor in further processes of transformation. Thus migration should be included in strategies for achieving change, but the conditions for realising positive results are complex and difficult. Strategies of «remittance–led development» seem simplistic and naïve. Migration alone cannot remove structural constraints to sustainable economic growth. There is a need for broadly–based long–term approaches that links the potential benefits of migration with more general strategies to reduce inequality and to improve economic infrastructure, social welfare and political governance.
format Artículo científico
Artículo científico
author Stephen Castles
author_facet Stephen Castles
author_sort Stephen Castles
title Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
title_short Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
title_full Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
title_fullStr Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
title_sort comparing the experience of five major emigration countries
publisher Red Internacional de Migración y Desarrollo
publishDate 2006
url http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=66000707
http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/gsdl/cgi-bin/library.cgi?a=d&c=mx/mx-037&d=66000707oai
work_keys_str_mv AT stephencastles comparingtheexperienceoffivemajoremigrationcountries
bdutipo_str Repositorios
_version_ 1764820426029006849