The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art
While Benjamin had hope in the technically reproduced works of art’s revolutionary potential and denounced the fascist elaboration of the categories linked to the auratic work of art, Adorno condemned the cultural industry’s products as functional to the instrumental rationality and expected that th...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ISHiR/CONICET
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://web3.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/ojs/index.php/revistaISHIR/article/view/827 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R239-article-827 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I15-R239-article-8272018-07-14T00:48:13Z The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art Las perspectivas de Benjamin y Adorno en relación con la obra de arte Casanovas, Agustín Benjamin Adorno Obra de arte Estética Teoría crítica Benjamin Adorno Work of art Aesthetics Critical theory While Benjamin had hope in the technically reproduced works of art’s revolutionary potential and denounced the fascist elaboration of the categories linked to the auratic work of art, Adorno condemned the cultural industry’s products as functional to the instrumental rationality and expected that the authentic works of art were the place where the sensitive truth, related to reconciliation and happiness, appear. The following article tries to set up a dialogue between the perspectives of both authors regarding concepts as aura, repeatability and similarity and the roles of politics and audiences in arts. The pretention is to partially illuminate the different visions on human emancipation that lead one of them to the dialectization of the technically reproduced art and the other one to do the same, but with the authentic art. Mientras Benjamin ponía sus esperanzas en el potencial revolucionario de las obras de arte reproducidas técnicamente y denunciaba la elaboración fascista de las categorías asociadas a la obra de arte aurática, Adorno condenaba los productos de la industria cultural como serviles a la racionalidad instrumental y se esperanzaba en que sea en las obras de arte auténticas donde la verdad sensible, que se relaciona con la reconciliación y la felicidad, aparezca. El siguiente trabajo intenta poner en diálogo las perspectivas de ambos autores en torno a conceptos tales como aura, repetibilidad y semejanza y al lugar de la política y el público en las artes. La pretensión es iluminar parcialmente las distintas visiones de la emancipación humana que llevaron a uno a profundizar en la dialectización del arte reproducido técnicamente y al otro en la del arte auténtico. ISHiR/CONICET 2018-04-10 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://web3.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/ojs/index.php/revistaISHIR/article/view/827 10.35305/eishir.v8i20.827 Estudios del ISHiR; Vol. 8 Núm. 20 (2018): Estudios del ISHiR; 127-134 Estudios del ISHiR; Vol. 8 No. 20 (2018): Estudios del ISHiR; 127-134 2250-4397 spa https://web3.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/ojs/index.php/revistaISHIR/article/view/827/911 Derechos de autor 2018 Estudios del ISHiR |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-239 |
| container_title_str |
Revista Estudios del ISHIR (CONICET) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Benjamin Adorno Obra de arte Estética Teoría crítica Benjamin Adorno Work of art Aesthetics Critical theory |
| spellingShingle |
Benjamin Adorno Obra de arte Estética Teoría crítica Benjamin Adorno Work of art Aesthetics Critical theory Casanovas, Agustín The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art |
| topic_facet |
Benjamin Adorno Obra de arte Estética Teoría crítica Benjamin Adorno Work of art Aesthetics Critical theory |
| author |
Casanovas, Agustín |
| author_facet |
Casanovas, Agustín |
| author_sort |
Casanovas, Agustín |
| title |
The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art |
| title_short |
The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art |
| title_full |
The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art |
| title_fullStr |
The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The perspectives of Benjamin and Adorno regarding the work of art |
| title_sort |
perspectives of benjamin and adorno regarding the work of art |
| description |
While Benjamin had hope in the technically reproduced works of art’s revolutionary potential and denounced the fascist elaboration of the categories linked to the auratic work of art, Adorno condemned the cultural industry’s products as functional to the instrumental rationality and expected that the authentic works of art were the place where the sensitive truth, related to reconciliation and happiness, appear. The following article tries to set up a dialogue between the perspectives of both authors regarding concepts as aura, repeatability and similarity and the roles of politics and audiences in arts. The pretention is to partially illuminate the different visions on human emancipation that lead one of them to the dialectization of the technically reproduced art and the other one to do the same, but with the authentic art. |
| publisher |
ISHiR/CONICET |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
https://web3.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/ojs/index.php/revistaISHIR/article/view/827 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT casanovasagustin theperspectivesofbenjaminandadornoregardingtheworkofart AT casanovasagustin lasperspectivasdebenjaminyadornoenrelacionconlaobradearte AT casanovasagustin perspectivesofbenjaminandadornoregardingtheworkofart |
| first_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:55:10Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:55:10Z |
| _version_ |
1769807660550455296 |