Rural conflictivity, mobilization of subaltern sectors and bandolerism in the wars of independence. The insurging warriors of Cochabamba (1814-1816)
Since the advent of Hobsbawm's famous "Primitive Rebels," there has been a proliferation of studies on banditry in Latin America. Considering the contribution of these studies, we propose to question Hobsbawm's theory of banditry as a pre-political movement, through the case stud...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
ISHiR/CONICET
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://web3.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/ojs/index.php/revistaISHIR/article/view/742 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Since the advent of Hobsbawm's famous "Primitive Rebels," there has been a proliferation of studies on banditry in Latin America. Considering the contribution of these studies, we propose to question Hobsbawm's theory of banditry as a pre-political movement, through the case study of the collective actions undertaken by the Vallegrande guerrillas, commanded by Juan Antonio Álvarez de Arenales, in The Governor of Cochabamba between 1814-1816, emphasizing fundamentally the war of resources that developed the indigenous bias of the region.
Through the analysis of the documentation, we maintain that the collective actions undertaken by the indigenous groups of the region were premeditated and assumed political characteristics throughout the war. |
|---|