Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History?
Economic history is a frontier discipline: its analytical tools are based on both historical and economic sciences. Precisely for this reason, the fact that a significant part of contemporary economic history is limited to taking as a reference only the contributions of economics and, in particular,...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Grupo Prohistoria
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1724 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R238-article-1724 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I15-R238-article-17242023-01-05T13:19:09Z Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? ¿La teoría económica puede sobrevivir sin una relación con la historia? A teoria econômica pode sobreviver sem uma relação com a história? Sabatini, Gaetano Historia Económica Metodologías en la Historia Económica história econômica Metodologia em História Econômica Análise Quantitativa e Qualitativa na Pesquisa Histórica Economic History Methodology in Economic History Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Historical Research Economic history is a frontier discipline: its analytical tools are based on both historical and economic sciences. Precisely for this reason, the fact that a significant part of contemporary economic history is limited to taking as a reference only the contributions of economics and, in particular, of the more strictly quantitative economic analysis, constitutes a serious limitation of its interpretative capacity. On the contrary, it seems essential that economic history be open to receive all the methodological contributions that may come from the historical sciences and, in general, from the social sciences that also make use of the qualitative analysis of historical phenomena. La historia económica es una disciplina de frontera: sus herramientas de análisis se basan tanto en las ciencias históricas como en las económicas y, precisamente por ello, el hecho de que una parte importante de la historia económica contemporánea se limite únicamente a tomar como referencia las aportaciones de la economía y, en particular, del análisis económico más estrictamente cuantitativo constituye una grave limitación de su capacidad de interpretación. Por el contrario, parece imprescindible que la historia económica esté abierta a recibir todas las aportaciones metodológicas que puedan provenir de las ciencias históricas y, en general, de las ciencias sociales que se sirven también del análisis cualitativo de los fenómenos históricos. A história econômica é uma disciplina de fronteira: suas ferramentas analíticas são baseadas tanto nas ciências históricas quanto nas ciências econômicas e, justamente por isso, o fato de que uma parte importante da história econômica contemporânea se limita apenas a tomar como referência as contribuições da economia e, em particular, , da análise económica mais estritamente quantitativa constitui uma grave limitação da sua capacidade de interpretação. Ao contrário, parece fundamental que a história econômica esteja aberta a receber todas as contribuições metodológicas que venham das ciências históricas e, em geral, das ciências sociais que também se valem da análise qualitativa dos fenômenos históricos. Grupo Prohistoria 2022-12-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf application/zip text/html https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1724 10.35305/prohistoria.vi38.1724 Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia; No. 38 (2022); 1-10 Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia; Núm. 38 (2022); 1-10 Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia; n. 38 (2022); 1-10 1851-9504 1514-0032 spa https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1724/2517 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1724/2518 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1724/2519 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-238 |
| container_title_str |
Prohistoria. Historia, políticas de la historia (CONICET) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Historia Económica Metodologías en la Historia Económica história econômica Metodologia em História Econômica Análise Quantitativa e Qualitativa na Pesquisa Histórica Economic History Methodology in Economic History Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Historical Research |
| spellingShingle |
Historia Económica Metodologías en la Historia Económica história econômica Metodologia em História Econômica Análise Quantitativa e Qualitativa na Pesquisa Histórica Economic History Methodology in Economic History Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Historical Research Sabatini, Gaetano Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? |
| topic_facet |
Historia Económica Metodologías en la Historia Económica história econômica Metodologia em História Econômica Análise Quantitativa e Qualitativa na Pesquisa Histórica Economic History Methodology in Economic History Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Historical Research |
| author |
Sabatini, Gaetano |
| author_facet |
Sabatini, Gaetano |
| author_sort |
Sabatini, Gaetano |
| title |
Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? |
| title_short |
Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? |
| title_full |
Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? |
| title_fullStr |
Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Can Economic Theory Survive without a Relationship to History? |
| title_sort |
can economic theory survive without a relationship to history? |
| description |
Economic history is a frontier discipline: its analytical tools are based on both historical and economic sciences. Precisely for this reason, the fact that a significant part of contemporary economic history is limited to taking as a reference only the contributions of economics and, in particular, of the more strictly quantitative economic analysis, constitutes a serious limitation of its interpretative capacity. On the contrary, it seems essential that economic history be open to receive all the methodological contributions that may come from the historical sciences and, in general, from the social sciences that also make use of the qualitative analysis of historical phenomena. |
| publisher |
Grupo Prohistoria |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1724 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sabatinigaetano caneconomictheorysurvivewithoutarelationshiptohistory AT sabatinigaetano lateoriaeconomicapuedesobrevivirsinunarelacionconlahistoria AT sabatinigaetano ateoriaeconomicapodesobreviversemumarelacaocomahistoria |
| first_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:53:45Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:53:45Z |
| _version_ |
1769807571176128512 |