State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

This article analyzes the exceptional measures as mechanisms of social discipline and labor conflict resolution enforced during the first decade of the 20th century. It examines the laws of permanent exception, i.e. the “Law of residency” and “Social defense law,” as well as the recurring state of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Franco, Marina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR) 2019
Materias:
estado de excepción
represión
Ley de Residencia
cuestión social
Argentina
state of exception
repression
law of residency
social issues
Argentine
Acceso en línea:https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v16a20a02
Aporte de:
Avances del CESOR (CONICET) de Universidad Nacional de Rosario
id I15-R237-article-945
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R237-article-9452020-12-06T00:05:45Z State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question El estado de excepción a comienzos del siglo XX: de la cuestión obrera a la cuestión nacional Franco, Marina estado de excepción represión Ley de Residencia cuestión social Argentina state of exception repression law of residency social issues Argentine This article analyzes the exceptional measures as mechanisms of social discipline and labor conflict resolution enforced during the first decade of the 20th century. It examines the laws of permanent exception, i.e. the “Law of residency” and “Social defense law,” as well as the recurring state of siege between 1902 and 1910. These laws affected those segments of the population defined as “agitators” of national security, while “anarchists and other individuals” were regarded as “dangerous”. The article examines this legislation as part of a whole body of exceptional measures and it also allows a closer look at certain specific mechanisms activated to respond to social and working-class issues. This work forms part of a broader-scope research on the state’s repressive modes and practices as well as its diverse agencies and players throughout the 20th century. Este artículo analiza las medidas de excepción tomadas durante la primera década del siglo XX como mecanismo de disciplinamiento social y resolución de los conflictos obreros durante esos años. Para ello se analizan las leyes de excepción permanentes (“Ley de Residencia” y de “Defensa Social”) así como las medidas de estado de sitio que fueron recurrentes entre 1902 y 1910. Esta legislación afectó diversas categorías definidas por la propia legislación como inmigrantes y extranjeros “perturbadores” de la seguridad nacional y “anarquistas y demás personas” consideradas “peligrosas”. El objetivo del trabajo es abordar el conjunto de esta normativa como legislación de excepción y observar algunos mecanismos específicos puestos en marcha para responder a la cuestión social y obrera en esos años. Este trabajo se inserta en una línea de investigación más amplia sobre las formas y prácticas represivas del Estado y sus diferentes agencias y actores a lo largo del siglo XX. Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR) 2019-06-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf application/epub+zip text/html https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v16a20a02 10.35305/ac.v16i20.945 Avances del Cesor; Vol. 16 No. 20 (2019): Junio; 29-51 Avances del Cesor; Vol. 16 Núm. 20 (2019): Junio; 29-51 2422-6580 1514-3899 spa https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v16a20a02/1037 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v16a20a02/1052 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v16a20a02/1053
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-237
container_title_str Avances del CESOR (CONICET)
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic estado de excepción
represión
Ley de Residencia
cuestión social
Argentina
state of exception
repression
law of residency
social issues
Argentine
spellingShingle estado de excepción
represión
Ley de Residencia
cuestión social
Argentina
state of exception
repression
law of residency
social issues
Argentine
Franco, Marina
State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
topic_facet estado de excepción
represión
Ley de Residencia
cuestión social
Argentina
state of exception
repression
law of residency
social issues
Argentine
author Franco, Marina
author_facet Franco, Marina
author_sort Franco, Marina
title State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
title_short State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
title_full State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
title_fullStr State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
title_full_unstemmed State of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
title_sort state of exception at the beginning of the twentieth century: from the working-class question to the national question
description This article analyzes the exceptional measures as mechanisms of social discipline and labor conflict resolution enforced during the first decade of the 20th century. It examines the laws of permanent exception, i.e. the “Law of residency” and “Social defense law,” as well as the recurring state of siege between 1902 and 1910. These laws affected those segments of the population defined as “agitators” of national security, while “anarchists and other individuals” were regarded as “dangerous”. The article examines this legislation as part of a whole body of exceptional measures and it also allows a closer look at certain specific mechanisms activated to respond to social and working-class issues. This work forms part of a broader-scope research on the state’s repressive modes and practices as well as its diverse agencies and players throughout the 20th century.
publisher Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
publishDate 2019
url https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/v16a20a02
work_keys_str_mv AT francomarina stateofexceptionatthebeginningofthetwentiethcenturyfromtheworkingclassquestiontothenationalquestion
AT francomarina elestadodeexcepcionacomienzosdelsigloxxdelacuestionobreraalacuestionnacional
first_indexed 2023-06-26T22:52:41Z
last_indexed 2023-06-26T22:52:41Z
_version_ 1769807504401760256

Ejemplares similares