Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina)
This paper is focused on the analysis of the debate which shaped the reform of departmental regime. It will be done through the inquiry of the claims made by conventionalists from the Democratic Party that supported the regime built around a political figure, and by those who advocated for its aboli...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR)
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1383 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R237-article-1383 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-237 |
| container_title_str |
Avances del CESOR (CONICET) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
liderança política federalismo Partido Democrata regime departamental jefatura política federalismo Partido Demócrata régimen departamental political leadership federalism Democratic Party departmental regime |
| spellingShingle |
liderança política federalismo Partido Democrata regime departamental jefatura política federalismo Partido Demócrata régimen departamental political leadership federalism Democratic Party departmental regime Giannone, Loreta Ruth Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) |
| topic_facet |
liderança política federalismo Partido Democrata regime departamental jefatura política federalismo Partido Demócrata régimen departamental political leadership federalism Democratic Party departmental regime |
| author |
Giannone, Loreta Ruth |
| author_facet |
Giannone, Loreta Ruth |
| author_sort |
Giannone, Loreta Ruth |
| title |
Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) |
| title_short |
Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) |
| title_full |
Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) |
| title_fullStr |
Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) |
| title_sort |
centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? the debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, cordoba (argentina) |
| description |
This paper is focused on the analysis of the debate which shaped the reform of departmental regime. It will be done through the inquiry of the claims made by conventionalists from the Democratic Party that supported the regime built around a political figure, and by those who advocated for its abolishment. Three topics are interconnected in this debate, and they are linked to the federal notion of the regime of political representation. First, the stands related to the responsibilities and/or duties of political leaders; second, the links between the Provincial Executive branch and departmental authority; last, the centralization-decentralization of departmental politics.
The proposal addresses the conflicting interests, and the underlying motivations of the conservative conventionalists that supported one side or the other; consequently, some of the political actors' careers and the ideas that modulated their opinions are briefly described. |
| publisher |
Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR) |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1383 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT giannoneloretaruth centralizingordecentralizingthedepartmentalregimethedebatearoundthesuppressionofpoliticalheadshipsin1923cordobaargentina AT giannoneloretaruth centralizarodescentralizarelregimendepartamentaleldebateentornoalasupresiondelasjefaturaspoliticasen1923cordobaargentina AT giannoneloretaruth centralizaroudescentralizaroregimedepartamentalodebateemtornodasupressaodechefiaspoliticasem1923cordobaargentina |
| first_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:52:26Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:52:26Z |
| _version_ |
1769807487954845696 |
| spelling |
I15-R237-article-13832021-06-07T19:59:39Z Centralizing or decentralizing the departmental regime? The debate around the suppression of political headships in 1923, Cordoba (Argentina) ¿Centralizar o descentralizar el régimen departamental? El debate en torno a la supresión de las jefaturas políticas en 1923, Córdoba (Argentina) Centralizar ou descentralizar o regime departamental? O debate em torno da supressão de chefias políticas em 1923, Córdoba (Argentina) Giannone, Loreta Ruth liderança política federalismo Partido Democrata regime departamental jefatura política federalismo Partido Demócrata régimen departamental political leadership federalism Democratic Party departmental regime This paper is focused on the analysis of the debate which shaped the reform of departmental regime. It will be done through the inquiry of the claims made by conventionalists from the Democratic Party that supported the regime built around a political figure, and by those who advocated for its abolishment. Three topics are interconnected in this debate, and they are linked to the federal notion of the regime of political representation. First, the stands related to the responsibilities and/or duties of political leaders; second, the links between the Provincial Executive branch and departmental authority; last, the centralization-decentralization of departmental politics. The proposal addresses the conflicting interests, and the underlying motivations of the conservative conventionalists that supported one side or the other; consequently, some of the political actors' careers and the ideas that modulated their opinions are briefly described. El presente artículo se concentra en el análisis del debate que moduló la reforma del régimen departamental a través de la indagación de los argumentos de los convencionales por el Partido Demócrata que defendían el régimen en torno a esta figura política y de aquellos que abogaron por su eliminación. El debate articula tres tópicos íntimamente vinculados a la noción federal del régimen de representación política y en torno a dicha dimensión se estructuran en primer lugar, las posiciones sobre las atribuciones y/o funciones de los jefes políticos, en segundo lugar, los vínculos entre el Ejecutivo Provincial y el poder departamental y finalmente, la centralización-descentralización de la policía departamental. La propuesta recupera los intereses en pugna y las motivaciones subyacentes de los convencionales conservadores que apoyaron una u otra posición, por lo que se describen brevemente las trayectorias de los actores y las ideas que modulaban sus argumentos. Este artigo se concentra na análise do debate que modulou a reforma do regime departamental por meio da investigação dos argumentos dos convencionalistas do Partido Democrata que defenderam o regime em torno dessa figura política e daqueles que defenderam sua eliminação. O debate articula três temas intimamente ligados à noção federal de regime de representação política e em torno dessa dimensão se estruturam em primeiro lugar as posições sobre as atribuições e / ou funções dos dirigentes políticos e, em segundo lugar, os vínculos entre o Executivo Provincial. e poder departamental e, finalmente, a centralização-descentralização da polícia departamental.A proposta recupera os interesses conflitantes e as motivações subjacentes aos conservadores convencionais que defendiam uma ou outra posição, para os quais as trajetórias dos atores e as ideias que modulam seus argumentos são brevemente descritas. Investigaciones Socio-Históricas Regionales (ISHIR) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Universidad Nacional de Rosario (UNR) 2021-06-07 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf text/html application/zip https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1383 10.35305/ac.v18i24.1383 Avances del Cesor; Vol. 18 No. 24 (2021): June Avances del Cesor; Vol. 18 Núm. 24 (2021): Junio 2422-6580 1514-3899 spa https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1383/1823 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1383/1824 https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/AvancesCesor/article/view/1383/1825 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |