1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence
This article aims to study the practical validity and political operativity that the Commune-form of organization continues to have among us, today. We will focus on two current and untimely self-emancipatory movements: ‘Zapatism’ and the M.A.R.E.Z. (in Mexico), and ‘Democratic Confederalism’ and th...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/96 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R231-article-96 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-231 |
| container_title_str |
Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época (UNR) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Estado-nación confederalismo democrático comuna autonomismo socialismo libertario patriarcado democracia directa Paris Commune autonomism libertary socialism democratic confederalism State Nation patriarchy direct demmocracy |
| spellingShingle |
Estado-nación confederalismo democrático comuna autonomismo socialismo libertario patriarcado democracia directa Paris Commune autonomism libertary socialism democratic confederalism State Nation patriarchy direct demmocracy Chicolino, Martin 1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| topic_facet |
Estado-nación confederalismo democrático comuna autonomismo socialismo libertario patriarcado democracia directa Paris Commune autonomism libertary socialism democratic confederalism State Nation patriarchy direct demmocracy |
| author |
Chicolino, Martin |
| author_facet |
Chicolino, Martin |
| author_sort |
Chicolino, Martin |
| title |
1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| title_short |
1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| title_full |
1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| title_fullStr |
1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| title_full_unstemmed |
1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| title_sort |
1871-2021: from paris to chiapas and kurdistan: the «commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence |
| description |
This article aims to study the practical validity and political operativity that the Commune-form of organization continues to have among us, today. We will focus on two current and untimely self-emancipatory movements: ‘Zapatism’ and the M.A.R.E.Z. (in Mexico), and ‘Democratic Confederalism’ and the cantons (in Kurdistan). These are two collective movements that, according to the activists involved —and here we will be guided by the texts and materials produced from both movements— deliberately update and renew the ‘Commune’ (and its historical heritage) as a form or mode of organization liberatory and egalitarian, depatriarchal and descolonial type, breaking out as a ‘third way’ in the midst of our patriarchal state and capitalist societies, traversed by all kinds of vertical, dissymmetric, hierarchical, andromorphic and phallocratic divisions. We will begin by defining the most fundamental characteristics of the novelty implied by the Paris Commune in the 19th Century (not from the ‘ideological’ point of view, but from the point of view of the organizational diagram of power relationships). Then, we will see the problem of the ‘commune’ as becoming-minority, proposing that the commune-form produces a differential human subjectivation with respect to state subjectivation. Next, we will study the problem of ‘double combat’ (interior and exterior), showing how the women’s struggle was the greatest vector of self-emancipatory flight (against male companions). And finally, we will study the an-organic consistency of the Commune-form of organization (against the idea of the ‘Organic State’), and we will list its differential features. |
| publisher |
Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/96 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT chicolinomartin 18712021fromparistochiapasandkurdistanthecommuneasarevolutionaryutopiaofpresentimmanence AT chicolinomartin 18712021deparisachiapasykurdistanlacomunacomoutopiarevolucionariadeinmanenciaactual |
| first_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:47:39Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:47:39Z |
| _version_ |
1769807187620659200 |
| spelling |
I15-R231-article-962021-09-15T14:24:08Z 1871-2021: from Paris to Chiapas and Kurdistan: The «Commune» as a revolutionary utopia of present immanence 1871-2021: de París a Chiapas y Kurdistán: La «Comuna» como utopía revolucionaria de inmanencia actual Chicolino, Martin Estado-nación confederalismo democrático comuna autonomismo socialismo libertario patriarcado democracia directa Paris Commune autonomism libertary socialism democratic confederalism State Nation patriarchy direct demmocracy This article aims to study the practical validity and political operativity that the Commune-form of organization continues to have among us, today. We will focus on two current and untimely self-emancipatory movements: ‘Zapatism’ and the M.A.R.E.Z. (in Mexico), and ‘Democratic Confederalism’ and the cantons (in Kurdistan). These are two collective movements that, according to the activists involved —and here we will be guided by the texts and materials produced from both movements— deliberately update and renew the ‘Commune’ (and its historical heritage) as a form or mode of organization liberatory and egalitarian, depatriarchal and descolonial type, breaking out as a ‘third way’ in the midst of our patriarchal state and capitalist societies, traversed by all kinds of vertical, dissymmetric, hierarchical, andromorphic and phallocratic divisions. We will begin by defining the most fundamental characteristics of the novelty implied by the Paris Commune in the 19th Century (not from the ‘ideological’ point of view, but from the point of view of the organizational diagram of power relationships). Then, we will see the problem of the ‘commune’ as becoming-minority, proposing that the commune-form produces a differential human subjectivation with respect to state subjectivation. Next, we will study the problem of ‘double combat’ (interior and exterior), showing how the women’s struggle was the greatest vector of self-emancipatory flight (against male companions). And finally, we will study the an-organic consistency of the Commune-form of organization (against the idea of the ‘Organic State’), and we will list its differential features. El presente artículo se propone estudiar la vigencia práctica y la operatividad política que la forma-Comuna de organización sigue teniendo entre nosotrxs, hoy. Nos enfocaremos en dos movimientos auto-emancipatorios actuales y a la vez intempestivos: el zapatismo y los M.A.R.E.Z. (en México), y el Confederalismo Democrático y los cantones (en el Kurdistán). Se trata de dos movimientos colectivos que, según sostienen lxs propixs activistas implicadxs —y aquí nos guiaremos por los textos y materiales producidos desde ambos movimientos—, actualizan y renuevan deliberadamente a la ‘Comuna’ (y a su herencia histórica) como forma o modo de organización liberatorio e igualitario, despatriarcal y descolonial, irrumpiendo como una ‘tercera vía’ en medio de nuestras sociedades patriarcales estatales y capitalistas, atravesadas por todo tipo de divisiones verticales, disimétricas, jerárquicas, andromórficas y falocráticas. Comenzaremos definiendo los rasgos más fundamentales de la novedad que implicaba la Comuna de París en el siglo XIX (no desde el punto de vista ‘ideológico’ sino desde el punto de vista del diagrama de organización de las relaciones de poder). Luego, veremos el problema de la ‘comuna’ como devenir-minoritario, planteando que la forma-Comuna produce una subjetivación humana diferencial con respecto a la subjetivación estatal. A continuación, estudiaremos el problema del ‘doble combate’ (interior y exterior) mostrando cómo la lucha de las mujeres fue el mayor vector de fuga auto-emancipatoria (contra los compañeros varones). Y finalmente, estudiaremos la consistencia an-orgánica de la forma-Comuna de organización (contra la idea del ‘Estado orgánico’), y enumeraremos sus rasgos diferenciales. Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2021-09-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares application/pdf https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/96 10.35305/cf2.vi17.96 Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época; No. 17 (2020) Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época; Núm. 17 (2020) 2683-9024 1850-3667 spa https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/96/111 Derechos de autor 2021 Martin Chicolino https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |