COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology
This paper deals with the COVID 19 pandemic problems from the point of view of political epistemology. It analyses the validity of conspiracy theories related to the origin, existence, and premeditation of COVID 19, as well as the effectiveness and legitimacy of the vaccines developed to stop its ad...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/104 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I15-R231-article-104 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I15-R231-article-1042022-02-02T22:25:42Z COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology COVID-19, teorías conspirativas y epistemología política Lariguet, Guillermo Yuan, María Sol COVID-19 teorÃas conspirativas epistemologÃa polÃtica racionalidad razonabilidad COVID-19 conspiracy theories political epistemology rationality reasonability This paper deals with the COVID 19 pandemic problems from the point of view of political epistemology. It analyses the validity of conspiracy theories related to the origin, existence, and premeditation of COVID 19, as well as the effectiveness and legitimacy of the vaccines developed to stop its advance. To this end, the development of the work focuses on what we call the problem of the "formulation" that underlies conspiracy theories, analyzing it in two related dimensions. The first dimension of an epistemic nature provides a demarcation criterion for the rationality of theories based on the falsification criterion. The second dimension accentuates a political aspect analyzed from the standard of the reasonableness of such views. Both factors point out that conspiracy theories around the pandemic leave the world aside, whether in terms of the empirical basis that supports it or the democratic public space necessary for its development deliberation. From this approach, these views result in irrational and unreasonable ones to different degrees. El presente trabajo se ocupa del problema de la pandemia del COVID 19 desde el punto de vista de una epistemología política. En particular, se analizará la validez de las teorías conspirativas relacionadas con el origen, existencia y premeditación de la COVID 19, así como de la efectividad y legitimidad de las vacunas desarrolladas para frenar su avance. Con tal finalidad, el desarrollo del trabajo se centra en lo que denominamos el problema de la “formulación” que subyace a las teorías conspirativas, analizándolo en dos dimensiones vinculadas. La primera dimensión de índole epistémica imprime un criterio de demarcación para la racionalidad de las teorías basadas en el criterio de falsación. La segunda dimensión acentúa un aspecto político analizado desde el criterio de la razonabilidad de las teorías. Ambos aspectos contribuyen a señalar que bajo diferentes grados de irracionalidad e i-razonabilidad, las teorías conspirativas en torno a la pandemia dejan al mundo de lado, sea esto comprendido en términos de la base empírica que le sirve de sostén o del espacio público democrático necesario para su deliberación. Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2021-12-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/104 10.35305/cf2.vi18.104 Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época; No. 18 (2021) Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época; Núm. 18 (2021) 2683-9024 1850-3667 spa https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/104/138 Derechos de autor 2021 Guillermo Lariguet, María Sol Yuan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
institution_str |
I-15 |
repository_str |
R-231 |
container_title_str |
Cuadernos Filosóficos / Segunda Época (UNR) |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
COVID-19 teorÃas conspirativas epistemologÃa polÃtica racionalidad razonabilidad COVID-19 conspiracy theories political epistemology rationality reasonability |
spellingShingle |
COVID-19 teorÃas conspirativas epistemologÃa polÃtica racionalidad razonabilidad COVID-19 conspiracy theories political epistemology rationality reasonability Lariguet, Guillermo Yuan, María Sol COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
topic_facet |
COVID-19 teorÃas conspirativas epistemologÃa polÃtica racionalidad razonabilidad COVID-19 conspiracy theories political epistemology rationality reasonability |
author |
Lariguet, Guillermo Yuan, María Sol |
author_facet |
Lariguet, Guillermo Yuan, María Sol |
author_sort |
Lariguet, Guillermo |
title |
COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
title_short |
COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
title_full |
COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
title_fullStr |
COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
title_full_unstemmed |
COVID-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
title_sort |
covid-19, conspiracy theories and political epistemology |
description |
This paper deals with the COVID 19 pandemic problems from the point of view of political epistemology. It analyses the validity of conspiracy theories related to the origin, existence, and premeditation of COVID 19, as well as the effectiveness and legitimacy of the vaccines developed to stop its advance. To this end, the development of the work focuses on what we call the problem of the "formulation" that underlies conspiracy theories, analyzing it in two related dimensions. The first dimension of an epistemic nature provides a demarcation criterion for the rationality of theories based on the falsification criterion. The second dimension accentuates a political aspect analyzed from the standard of the reasonableness of such views. Both factors point out that conspiracy theories around the pandemic leave the world aside, whether in terms of the empirical basis that supports it or the democratic public space necessary for its development deliberation. From this approach, these views result in irrational and unreasonable ones to different degrees. |
publisher |
Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/104 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lariguetguillermo covid19conspiracytheoriesandpoliticalepistemology AT yuanmariasol covid19conspiracytheoriesandpoliticalepistemology AT lariguetguillermo covid19teoriasconspirativasyepistemologiapolitica AT yuanmariasol covid19teoriasconspirativasyepistemologiapolitica |
first_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:47:19Z |
last_indexed |
2023-06-26T22:47:19Z |
_version_ |
1769807166619779072 |