Problemas de la “negatividad” en Respiración artificial de Ricardo Piglia
This article attempts to recover the theory about the link of Piglia’s work to the“negative aesthetics” presented by Sandra Contreras in Las vueltas de César Aira (2002)with the purpose of question it. The dominant component of critique literature aboutPiglia that may justify its apparent correlatio...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
CETYCLI
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/405 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This article attempts to recover the theory about the link of Piglia’s work to the“negative aesthetics” presented by Sandra Contreras in Las vueltas de César Aira (2002)with the purpose of question it. The dominant component of critique literature aboutPiglia that may justify its apparent correlation with the negative aesthetics –though it’snever mentioned in this terms- may be the relating to the value given to the reflexivecharacter of his work, that applied to the national historical coordinates of thedictatorship period, may explain the regression of mimetic aesthetics, caused by a newclass of political fiction, seemingly anti-representative. Read unanimously as anexperimental-political novel, the obligatory question to the contemporary critique,unconnected with the reception horizon of its time, it’s if the allegorical sense and thefragmentary figuration of history such as it may be conceived in Respiración artificial aresufficient to transform the work in autonomous. |
|---|