Barthes y la epanortosis
In academic research, we normally work with two distinct kinds of language: the object-language and the metalanguage of the researcher. Roland Barthes, who reflected intensely about this question, uses certain procedures on his writing that subvert this division. One of them is the epanorthosis. Epa...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
CETYCLI
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/404 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R206-article-404 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I15-R206-article-4042019-09-29T14:10:56Z Barthes y la epanortosis Ferraz, Paulo Procopio Roland Barthes Epanortosis Metalenguaje In academic research, we normally work with two distinct kinds of language: the object-language and the metalanguage of the researcher. Roland Barthes, who reflected intensely about this question, uses certain procedures on his writing that subvert this division. One of them is the epanorthosis. Epanorthosis is seen, by Pierre Fontanier, as a figure of speech. It is described by classical rhetoric as a movement of retroaction, in which a statement, deemed incorrect or not appropriated, is corrected in a subsequent sentence. However, to Fontanier, epanorthosis has a limited scope: in his examples, we clearly see when the figure begins and when it ends. Nevertheless, the systematic use of this figure by Barthes changes its function: it creates an instability that dissolves the limits that separated writing from the methodical description of objects. En las investigaciones académicas se trabaja, muchas veces, con dos tipos heterogéneos de lenguaje: el lenguaje objeto y el metalenguaje del investigador. Ahora bien, Roland Barthes, además de reflexionar explícitamente sobre este tópico, emplea ciertos procedimientos en su escritura que terminan por subvertir este orden de lenguajes. Uno de ellos es la epanortosis. Definida por Pierre Fontanier como una figura del lenguaje, la epanortosis es un procedimiento conocido por la retórica clásica: se trata de un movimiento de retroacción en el cual el discurso corrige una afirmación anterior, considerada poco apropiada. Para Fontanier la epanortosis tiene un alcance restringido: los ejemplos que esta provee tienen un comienzo y un fin bien delimitados. Sin embargo, percibimos que el uso sistemático de esta figura por parte de Barthes termina por modificar su función: el autor crea una inestabilidad que disuelve los límites que separaban a la escritura de la descripción metódica de un objeto. CETYCLI 2019-09-24 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/404 10.35305/b.v9i17.404 Badebec; Vol. 9 Núm. 17 (2019): Septiembre 2019; 134-142 1853-9580 spa https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/404/375 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-206 |
| container_title_str |
Badebec |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Roland Barthes Epanortosis Metalenguaje |
| spellingShingle |
Roland Barthes Epanortosis Metalenguaje Ferraz, Paulo Procopio Barthes y la epanortosis |
| topic_facet |
Roland Barthes Epanortosis Metalenguaje |
| author |
Ferraz, Paulo Procopio |
| author_facet |
Ferraz, Paulo Procopio |
| author_sort |
Ferraz, Paulo Procopio |
| title |
Barthes y la epanortosis |
| title_short |
Barthes y la epanortosis |
| title_full |
Barthes y la epanortosis |
| title_fullStr |
Barthes y la epanortosis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Barthes y la epanortosis |
| title_sort |
barthes y la epanortosis |
| description |
In academic research, we normally work with two distinct kinds of language: the object-language and the metalanguage of the researcher. Roland Barthes, who reflected intensely about this question, uses certain procedures on his writing that subvert this division. One of them is the epanorthosis. Epanorthosis is seen, by Pierre Fontanier, as a figure of speech. It is described by classical rhetoric as a movement of retroaction, in which a statement, deemed incorrect or not appropriated, is corrected in a subsequent sentence. However, to Fontanier, epanorthosis has a limited scope: in his examples, we clearly see when the figure begins and when it ends. Nevertheless, the systematic use of this figure by Barthes changes its function: it creates an instability that dissolves the limits that separated writing from the methodical description of objects. |
| publisher |
CETYCLI |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/404 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT ferrazpauloprocopio barthesylaepanortosis |
| first_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:50:44Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:50:44Z |
| _version_ |
1765624821405712384 |