Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand
In its autocracy promotion towards Myanmar’s and Thailand’s military regimes, China especially applied incentives but also blackmailing practices. However, China also supported hybrid regimes. Then, China always selected soft and not hard power; military pressure has been indirect. There were strong...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/78 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I15-R205-article-78 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I15-R205-article-782023-04-20T23:33:28Z Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand L'autocracy promotion della Cina verso Myanmar and Thailand Tonetto, Priscilla Cina Myanmar Thailand Regimi autoritari Regimi ibridi China Myanmar Thailand Autocracy promotion Hybrid regimes In its autocracy promotion towards Myanmar’s and Thailand’s military regimes, China especially applied incentives but also blackmailing practices. However, China also supported hybrid regimes. Then, China always selected soft and not hard power; military pressure has been indirect. There were strong emulative processes of both Myanmar and Thailand. Chinese pragmatism promoted both options since, if China opposed hybrid regimes, this could cause the defeat of the military and the possible victory of pro-Western and anti-Chinese political actors. In order to avoid this result, Beijing governments adopted a more flexible autocracy promotion, reflecting a real-politik approach to foreign policy, which allowed to preserve Chinese diplomatic interests. Nella sua autocracy promotion verso i regimi militari di Myanmar e Thailand, la Cina ha applicato soprattutto incentivi ma anche ricatti. La Cina ha comunque sostenuto anche i regimi ibridi. Poi, la Cina ha sempre preferito il soft all’hard power; la pressione militare è stata indiretta. Si sono sviluppati così forti processi imitativi sia da parte del Myanmar che della Tailandia. Il pragmatismo cinese ha promosso entrambe le opzioni, perché se le Cina avesse ostacolato i regimi ibridi, ciò avrebbe causato la sconfitta delle forze armate e la possibile vittoria degli attori politici filo-occidentali e anti cinesi. Per evitare tale esito, i governi di Pechino hanno adottato una autocracy promotion flessibile, attraverso l’applicazione della real-politik alla politica estera, per tutelare gli interessi diplomatici cinesi. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022-08-18 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/78 10.35305/rr.vi5.78 Revista Euro latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP); Núm. 5 (2022); 94-117 2683-7420 eng https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/78/137 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
institution_str |
I-15 |
repository_str |
R-205 |
container_title_str |
RELASP |
language |
Inglés |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
Cina Myanmar Thailand Regimi autoritari Regimi ibridi China Myanmar Thailand Autocracy promotion Hybrid regimes |
spellingShingle |
Cina Myanmar Thailand Regimi autoritari Regimi ibridi China Myanmar Thailand Autocracy promotion Hybrid regimes Tonetto, Priscilla Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand |
topic_facet |
Cina Myanmar Thailand Regimi autoritari Regimi ibridi China Myanmar Thailand Autocracy promotion Hybrid regimes |
author |
Tonetto, Priscilla |
author_facet |
Tonetto, Priscilla |
author_sort |
Tonetto, Priscilla |
title |
Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand |
title_short |
Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand |
title_full |
Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand |
title_fullStr |
Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand |
title_sort |
chinese autocracy promotion towards myanmar and thailand |
description |
In its autocracy promotion towards Myanmar’s and Thailand’s military regimes, China especially applied incentives but also blackmailing practices. However, China also supported hybrid regimes. Then, China always selected soft and not hard power; military pressure has been indirect. There were strong emulative processes of both Myanmar and Thailand. Chinese pragmatism promoted both options since, if China opposed hybrid regimes, this could cause the defeat of the military and the possible victory of pro-Western and anti-Chinese political actors. In order to avoid this result, Beijing governments adopted a more flexible autocracy promotion, reflecting a real-politik approach to foreign policy, which allowed to preserve Chinese diplomatic interests. |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/78 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tonettopriscilla chineseautocracypromotiontowardsmyanmarandthailand AT tonettopriscilla lautocracypromotiondellacinaversomyanmarandthailand |
first_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:46:20Z |
last_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:46:20Z |
_version_ |
1765624544414924800 |