Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
This article reconstructs the distinct episodes that make up the 2014 self-defense conflict in Michoacán by using strategy analysis. Emphasis is placed on the actors’ reasons and motivations that drive their strategies in this conflict, particularly the Tierra Caliente self-defense groups’ and the f...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Artículo revista |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62 |
Aporte de: |
id |
I15-R205-article-62 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
I15-R205-article-622022-07-06T18:30:53Z Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict Racionalidades diversas: : el conflicto de las autodefensas michoacanas de 2014 Plancarte Escobar, Rafael Autodefensas Gobierno Federal Michoacán Motivaciones Teoría de juegos Game theory Mexican federal government Michoacán Motivations Self-defense groups This article reconstructs the distinct episodes that make up the 2014 self-defense conflict in Michoacán by using strategy analysis. Emphasis is placed on the actors’ reasons and motivations that drive their strategies in this conflict, particularly the Tierra Caliente self-defense groups’ and the federal government’s. Static game theory is used to achieve this. Based on a historical interpretation of the actors’ preferences, the article shows that the outcome of this case study is explained by the division of self-defense groups into pragmatic and non-pragmatic ones, as well as by the efforts of the Federal Government to subdue the autonomous character of some self-defense groups. In theoretical terms, this analysis demonstrates that agreements, disagreements and confrontations are the product of the interaction of the various motivations, selfish and non-selfish, that drive the actors’ strategies. Este artículo reconstruye, a partir de un análisis de estrategias, los diferentes episodios que componen el conflicto de las autodefensas de 2014 en Michoacán. Se pone énfasis en las motivaciones y razones que conducen las estrategias de los actores de este conflicto, particularmente, las de los grupos de autodefensas de Tierra Caliente y del Gobierno Federal. Para lograr esto se emplea teoría de juegos estática. A partir de una interpretación histórica de las preferencias de los actores, se muestra que el desenlace de este estudio de caso se explica por la división de autodefensas entre pragmáticas y no pragmáticas, así como por los esfuerzos del Gobierno Federal por someter el carácter autónomo de algunos grupos de autodefensas. En términos teóricos, se muestra que los acuerdos, desacuerdos y enfrentamientos son producto de la interacción de las diversas motivaciones, egoístas y no egoístas, que conducen las estrategias de los actores. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022-06-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62 10.35305/rr.v2i4.62 Revista Euro latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP); Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2022); 125-149 2683-7420 spa https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62/122 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
institution_str |
I-15 |
repository_str |
R-205 |
container_title_str |
RELASP |
language |
Español |
format |
Artículo revista |
topic |
Autodefensas Gobierno Federal Michoacán Motivaciones Teoría de juegos Game theory Mexican federal government Michoacán Motivations Self-defense groups |
spellingShingle |
Autodefensas Gobierno Federal Michoacán Motivaciones Teoría de juegos Game theory Mexican federal government Michoacán Motivations Self-defense groups Plancarte Escobar, Rafael Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict |
topic_facet |
Autodefensas Gobierno Federal Michoacán Motivaciones Teoría de juegos Game theory Mexican federal government Michoacán Motivations Self-defense groups |
author |
Plancarte Escobar, Rafael |
author_facet |
Plancarte Escobar, Rafael |
author_sort |
Plancarte Escobar, Rafael |
title |
Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict |
title_short |
Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict |
title_full |
Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict |
title_fullStr |
Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict |
title_sort |
diverse rationalities: : the 2014 michoacán self-defense groups’ conflict |
description |
This article reconstructs the distinct episodes that make up the 2014 self-defense conflict in Michoacán by using strategy analysis. Emphasis is placed on the actors’ reasons and motivations that drive their strategies in this conflict, particularly the Tierra Caliente self-defense groups’ and the federal government’s. Static game theory is used to achieve this. Based on a historical interpretation of the actors’ preferences, the article shows that the outcome of this case study is explained by the division of self-defense groups into pragmatic and non-pragmatic ones, as well as by the efforts of the Federal Government to subdue the autonomous character of some self-defense groups. In theoretical terms, this analysis demonstrates that agreements, disagreements and confrontations are the product of the interaction of the various motivations, selfish and non-selfish, that drive the actors’ strategies. |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT plancarteescobarrafael diverserationalitiesthe2014michoacanselfdefensegroupsconflict AT plancarteescobarrafael racionalidadesdiversaselconflictodelasautodefensasmichoacanasde2014 |
first_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:46:17Z |
last_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:46:17Z |
_version_ |
1765624541687578624 |