Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict

This article reconstructs the distinct episodes that make up the 2014 self-defense conflict in Michoacán by using strategy analysis. Emphasis is placed on the actors’ reasons and motivations that drive their strategies in this conflict, particularly the Tierra Caliente self-defense groups’ and the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Plancarte Escobar, Rafael
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62
Aporte de:
id I15-R205-article-62
record_format ojs
spelling I15-R205-article-622022-07-06T18:30:53Z Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict Racionalidades diversas: : el conflicto de las autodefensas michoacanas de 2014 Plancarte Escobar, Rafael Autodefensas Gobierno Federal Michoacán Motivaciones Teoría de juegos Game theory Mexican federal government Michoacán Motivations Self-defense groups This article reconstructs the distinct episodes that make up the 2014 self-defense conflict in Michoacán by using strategy analysis. Emphasis is placed on the actors’ reasons and motivations that drive their strategies in this conflict, particularly the Tierra Caliente self-defense groups’ and the federal government’s. Static game theory is used to achieve this. Based on a historical interpretation of the actors’ preferences, the article shows that the outcome of this case study is explained by the division of self-defense groups into pragmatic and non-pragmatic ones, as well as by the efforts of the Federal Government to subdue the autonomous character of some self-defense groups. In theoretical terms, this analysis demonstrates that agreements, disagreements and confrontations are the product of the interaction of the various motivations, selfish and non-selfish, that drive the actors’ strategies. Este artículo reconstruye, a partir de un análisis de estrategias, los diferentes episodios que componen el conflicto de las autodefensas de 2014 en Michoacán. Se pone énfasis en las motivaciones y razones que conducen las estrategias de los actores de este conflicto, particularmente, las de los grupos de autodefensas de Tierra Caliente y del Gobierno Federal. Para lograr esto se emplea teoría de juegos estática. A partir de una interpretación histórica de las preferencias de los actores, se muestra que el desenlace de este estudio de caso se explica por la división de autodefensas entre pragmáticas y no pragmáticas, así como por los esfuerzos del Gobierno Federal por someter el carácter autónomo de algunos grupos de autodefensas. En términos teóricos, se muestra que los acuerdos, desacuerdos y enfrentamientos son producto de la interacción de las diversas motivaciones, egoístas y no egoístas, que conducen las estrategias de los actores.     Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022-06-08 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62 10.35305/rr.v2i4.62 Revista Euro latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP); Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2022); 125-149 2683-7420 spa https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62/122 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
institution Universidad Nacional de Rosario
institution_str I-15
repository_str R-205
container_title_str RELASP
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Autodefensas
Gobierno Federal
Michoacán
Motivaciones
Teoría de juegos
Game theory
Mexican federal government
Michoacán
Motivations
Self-defense groups
spellingShingle Autodefensas
Gobierno Federal
Michoacán
Motivaciones
Teoría de juegos
Game theory
Mexican federal government
Michoacán
Motivations
Self-defense groups
Plancarte Escobar, Rafael
Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
topic_facet Autodefensas
Gobierno Federal
Michoacán
Motivaciones
Teoría de juegos
Game theory
Mexican federal government
Michoacán
Motivations
Self-defense groups
author Plancarte Escobar, Rafael
author_facet Plancarte Escobar, Rafael
author_sort Plancarte Escobar, Rafael
title Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
title_short Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
title_full Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
title_fullStr Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Diverse Rationalities: : The 2014 Michoacán Self-Defense Groups’ Conflict
title_sort diverse rationalities: : the 2014 michoacán self-defense groups’ conflict
description This article reconstructs the distinct episodes that make up the 2014 self-defense conflict in Michoacán by using strategy analysis. Emphasis is placed on the actors’ reasons and motivations that drive their strategies in this conflict, particularly the Tierra Caliente self-defense groups’ and the federal government’s. Static game theory is used to achieve this. Based on a historical interpretation of the actors’ preferences, the article shows that the outcome of this case study is explained by the division of self-defense groups into pragmatic and non-pragmatic ones, as well as by the efforts of the Federal Government to subdue the autonomous character of some self-defense groups. In theoretical terms, this analysis demonstrates that agreements, disagreements and confrontations are the product of the interaction of the various motivations, selfish and non-selfish, that drive the actors’ strategies.
publisher Universidad Nacional de Rosario
publishDate 2022
url https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/62
work_keys_str_mv AT plancarteescobarrafael diverserationalitiesthe2014michoacanselfdefensegroupsconflict
AT plancarteescobarrafael racionalidadesdiversaselconflictodelasautodefensasmichoacanasde2014
first_indexed 2023-05-11T18:46:17Z
last_indexed 2023-05-11T18:46:17Z
_version_ 1765624541687578624