Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America
In this article, political economies have been linked to the decision-making processes of Latin American countries, before and after 1989. Conservative and liberal reforms have usually been applied through neo-oligarchic decision-making processes. Social-democrat economic policies have often been im...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/12 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I15-R205-article-12 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I15-R205-article-122025-03-28T15:57:08Z Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America Politiche economiche e processi decisionali nell' America Latina Fossati, Fabio Politica Economica Processi Decisionali Populismo Tecnocrazie Partitocrazie Political Economy Decision-Making Process Populism Technocracies Party Government In this article, political economies have been linked to the decision-making processes of Latin American countries, before and after 1989. Conservative and liberal reforms have usually been applied through neo-oligarchic decision-making processes. Social-democrat economic policies have often been implemented with neo-corporatism. When “soft” populism prevailed, partitocrazia was the typical political instrument of lef tist governments, either if they governed or if they were at the opposition. Thus, they usual ly vetoed rightist presidents’ market reforms. The political consequence of “hard” populism has been authoritarianism, like in Venezuela with Chavez and Maduro. In “hybrid” economic policies, combining different models of political economies, there is not a stable decision-making process, and political conflict is usually strong. In questo articolo, le politiche economiche sono state collegate ai processi decisionali dei paesi dell’America latina. Le riforme conservatrici e liberali sono state di solito applicate con processi decisionali neo-oligarchici. Le politiche economiche social-democratiche sono state attuate grazie al neo-corporativismo. Quando il populismo moderato ha prevalso, la partitocrazia è stato il tipico strumento politico dei governi di sinistra: sia al governo che all’opposizione (nel secondo caso scattava il veto verso presidenti filo liberisti). La conseguenza politica del populismo radicale è stato l’autoritarismo (vedi il Venezuela di Chavez e Maduro). Nelle politiche economiche ibride, cioè che combinano tipi diversi di politica economica, il processo decisionale non è stabile e il conflitto politico è di solito molto forte. Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2022-03-20 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/12 10.35305/rr.v2i3.12 Revista Euro latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP); Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2021); 117-145 2683-7420 2683-7420 eng https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/12/12 https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/12/44 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| institution_str |
I-15 |
| repository_str |
R-205 |
| container_title_str |
RELASP |
| language |
Inglés |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Politica Economica Processi Decisionali Populismo Tecnocrazie Partitocrazie Political Economy Decision-Making Process Populism Technocracies Party Government |
| spellingShingle |
Politica Economica Processi Decisionali Populismo Tecnocrazie Partitocrazie Political Economy Decision-Making Process Populism Technocracies Party Government Fossati, Fabio Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America |
| topic_facet |
Politica Economica Processi Decisionali Populismo Tecnocrazie Partitocrazie Political Economy Decision-Making Process Populism Technocracies Party Government |
| author |
Fossati, Fabio |
| author_facet |
Fossati, Fabio |
| author_sort |
Fossati, Fabio |
| title |
Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America |
| title_short |
Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America |
| title_full |
Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America |
| title_fullStr |
Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Political economies and decision-making processes in Latin America |
| title_sort |
political economies and decision-making processes in latin america |
| description |
In this article, political economies have been linked to the decision-making processes of Latin American countries, before and after 1989. Conservative and liberal reforms have usually been applied through neo-oligarchic decision-making processes. Social-democrat economic policies have often been implemented with neo-corporatism. When “soft” populism prevailed, partitocrazia was the typical political instrument of lef tist governments, either if they governed or if they were at the opposition. Thus, they usual ly vetoed rightist presidents’ market reforms. The political consequence of “hard” populism has been authoritarianism, like in Venezuela with Chavez and Maduro. In “hybrid” economic policies, combining different models of political economies, there is not a stable decision-making process, and political conflict is usually strong. |
| publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Rosario |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/12 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT fossatifabio politicaleconomiesanddecisionmakingprocessesinlatinamerica AT fossatifabio politicheeconomicheeprocessidecisionalinellamericalatina |
| first_indexed |
2023-05-11T18:46:09Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-06-04T05:08:23Z |
| _version_ |
1833973793602666496 |